(In reply to Ismail Donmez from comment #2) > We can either fix the shared library versioning or obsolete libgsl0. I > prefer the former. Dmitry, can you please look at this? There is only 'one real' solution: split the libgsl19 out into chunks of smaller library packages. The policy clearly states that libs CAN be put together into one package IFF their sonum is step-locked... something which is no longer the case in libgsl. Thus, splitting is the only real solution (and in the background fix the brp check: that should have been caught by the checker already imho)