Comment # 14 on bug 990425 from Atri Bhattacharya

Thanks, Andreas! I see the appdata situation as fixed too. However, it is still
worrying that a simple "zypper se calibre" confuses names and summaries between
the specfile derived ones and those from the appstream metadata. This should
not happen. While I suggest that the current revision of calibre with its fixed
appstream metadata be pushed to Leap and Factory, this is something the zypper
guys still need to look at for Leap.

@zypp-maintainers
Could you please take a look at why doing
zypper se calibre
on openSUSE:Leap:42.1 gives a broken result? For sure it currently has a broken
appstream metadata file, but shouldn't the above command return summary and
name deduced from the specfile rather than from appdata? As a package
management tool, one would expect zypper to prioritise package results in
favour of applications, no?