Comment # 24 on bug 1203420 from Walddys Emmanuel Dorrejo C���spedes

(In reply to Jiri Bohac from comment #23)
> OK, closing as Invalid, thanks for confirming that disabling IPv6 in NM
> works!
> 
> (In reply to Walddys Emmanuel Dorrejo C���spedes from comment #22)
> > last question, if possible, why Tumbleweed change from wicked to NM?
> > 
> > and Wicked will stay alive?
> 
> I can not give you an authoritative answer. Just that I can see reasons to
> drop wicked in the long run: SUSE started the wicked project when NM was not
> nearly capable of managing complicated network setups required by our
> enterprise customers. Since then NM has evolved. It is quite possible it
> would be capable enough now. And and then it makes sense to question
> investing in the SUSE-specific wicked instead of using NM that everyone else
> uses, with a functional upstream community. I don't know what the decisions
> will be, but I don't think users need to worry too much: wicked won't be
> taken away until NM is believed by experts to be a good enough replacement :)

Thank you very much, and appreciate the time you take for enlighten me with
wicked and NM.