Comment # 6 on bug 1062068 from Franck Bui

(In reply to Michal Srb from comment #5)
> 
> I guess it could be. If systemd-logind would send some signal saying "Hey I
> am going away and not coming back any time soon.", we could listen for that.
> 
> It does not solve the case when systemd-logind crashes, but in my opinion we
> shouldn't try too hard in that case. If such important component crashes, I
> would expect anything can happen, so why should X server have some special
> safety against it.

Might be worth to ask if upstream would accept to implement such signal.

> With BindsTo I am observing this:
> * If B is stopped, then A is stopped. Good, we want that.
> * If B is restarted, then A is restarted. Bad, we don't want that.

Hmm... I'm not sure what the right behavior should be: currently I dont see the
point to restart A if B is restarted. A should be stopped in case the restart
of B fails though.