(In reply to Alexandre Vicenzi from comment #19) > (In reply to Takashi Iwai from comment #17) > > If you can still reproduce the problem with 5.19, at best, report this to > > the upstream. It should be fixed there at first. > > > > I was not able to reproduce this issue with 5.19. Aha, so it's been fixed between 5.18 and 5.19, supposedly? > > Just to be sure: you've tested vanilla kernel, and 5.15.x is only to 5.15.13? > > I'm asking it because 5.15.23 contains a known problematic stuff (the commit > > f0a60c7c4edee3f108ec435d457149175d0b0afa). > > Yes, the vanilla versions I tested were only 5.14.15, 5.15.13, and 5.16.16. OK, any chance to give a quick try with the revert of f0a60c7c4edee3f108ec435d457149175d0b0afa?