Comment # 2 on bug 967781 from
I can see a lot like this at target side:

[10350.476603] sbc_parse_cdb: 64 callbacks suppressed
[10350.476606] SCSI OP 2ah with too big sectors 2048 exceeds backend
hw_max_sectors: 1024
[10350.482549] SCSI OP 2ah with too big sectors 2048 exceeds backend
hw_max_sectors: 1024
[10350.488035] SCSI OP 2ah with too big sectors 2048 exceeds backend
hw_max_sectors: 1024
[10350.493533] SCSI OP 2ah with too big sectors 2048 exceeds backend
hw_max_sectors: 1024
[10350.499247] SCSI OP 2ah with too big sectors 2048 exceeds backend
hw_max_sectors: 1024
[10350.504729] SCSI OP 2ah with too big sectors 2048 exceeds backend
hw_max_sectors: 1024
[10350.510210] SCSI OP 2ah with too big sectors 2048 exceeds backend
hw_max_sectors: 1024
[10350.515944] SCSI OP 2ah with too big sectors 2048 exceeds backend
hw_max_sectors: 1024
[10350.521441] SCSI OP 2ah with too big sectors 2048 exceeds backend
hw_max_sectors: 1024
[10350.526907] SCSI OP 2ah with too big sectors 2048 exceeds backend
hw_max_sectors: 1024
[10356.048522] sbc_parse_cdb: 48 callbacks suppressed
[10356.048529] SCSI OP 2ah with too big sectors 2048 exceeds backend
hw_max_sectors: 1024
[10356.473505] SCSI OP 2ah with too big sectors 2040 exceeds backend
hw_max_sectors: 1024
[10356.476077] SCSI OP 2ah with too big sectors 2048 exceeds backend
hw_max_sectors: 1024
[10356.481830] SCSI OP 2ah with too big sectors 2048 exceeds backend
hw_max_sectors: 1024
[10356.595303] SCSI OP 2ah with too big sectors 2048 exceeds backend
hw_max_sectors: 1024
[10356.601056] SCSI OP 2ah with too big sectors 2048 exceeds backend
hw_max_sectors: 1024
[10356.711844] SCSI OP 2ah with too big sectors 2048 exceeds backend
hw_max_sectors: 1024
[10356.717816] SCSI OP 2ah with too big sectors 2048 exceeds backend
hw_max_sectors: 1024
[10356.801998] SCSI OP 2ah with too big sectors 2048 exceeds backend
hw_max_sectors: 1024
[10356.803810] SCSI OP 2ah with too big sectors 2048 exceeds backend
hw_max_sectors: 1024
[10362.101790] sbc_parse_cdb: 63 callbacks suppressed


You are receiving this mail because: