Comment # 14 on bug 1223783 from Atri Bhattacharya
TL;DR I think the update is ready for inclusion into oS:Factory at this point.
In addition to the main update itself, stuff we have been able to fix
includes:

* boo#1207563, including significant testing — not exhaustive, however —
  to ensure the updated baselibs.conf work in different situations.
* Switch to cmake+ninja for builds.

I shall send out the sr to lapack devel project (science) tonight.

Stuff we would like to work on, but perhaps decouple them from the scope
of this update (and this bug) are:

* boo#1223967: update-alternatives and x86-64-v3 hwcaps generation do
  not mix well and our current work-arounds are not yet in a
  ready-for-submission state
  (https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:badshah400:lapackv3/lapack)
* Fedora splits out separate 64-bit integer libraries for 64-bit
  archs in addition to 32-bit integer libs, to allow either or both
  32-bit and 64-bit libraries to be used. This is configured at build
  time (`-DBUILD_INDEX64=ON`). Perhaps we should look into this as well.

Perhaps difficult to work out given the structure of blas, cblas,
lapack, and lapacke libraries, but it would be useful to look at
installing the man files as part of the appropriate devel package
instead of a separate -man package like we have now. The current status
is the cleanest from the packaging point of view, but not the most
end-user/dev friendly (lapack-man needs to be installed manually).


You are receiving this mail because: