Comment # 3 on bug 960529 from Gary Ching-Pang Lin

(In reply to Marcus Meissner from comment #2)
> same as %files -n shim... 
> 
> 
> %post
> 
> is wrong if the package is named shim, it should be
> 
> %post -n shim
> 
Ah, right. The package was renamed.

> (why are you creating multiple shim binary rpms? this is probably not ok, as
> they will overwrite each other)

I didn't create shim-TW, but I know the reason why. MS requests us to use a
unified shim binary for the whole openSUSE, so that package was created to
repackage the Tumbleweed shim.