Comment # 1 on bug 1199305 from Michael Andres

(In reply to Andr��� Werlang from comment #0)
> The missing symbol seems to be from a recent update to libSDL2. Is it
> expected for the second command to succeed?

This can not be answered without a solver testcase. One would need to see all
available repos, package versions and their dependencies.

It may very well be that the replacement for ffmpeg-4 is not the same version
as the candidate for installing ffmpeg-5. Looking at the latest TW (20220507) I
cant find any ffmpeg-5 which would require 'libSDL2-2.0.so.0(V_2.0.22)' nor a
version ffmpeg-5-5.0.1-2.3. 

All packages - including ffmpeg-5 - refer to 'SUSE_' versions of libSDL2
> libSDL2-2_0-0-2.0.22-2.1.x86_64:
>  pro: libSDL2-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
>  pro: libSDL2-2.0.so.0(SUSE_2.0.10)(64bit)
>  pro: libSDL2-2.0.so.0(SUSE_2.0.12)(64bit)
>  pro: libSDL2-2.0.so.0(SUSE_2.0.14)(64bit)
>  pro: libSDL2-2.0.so.0(SUSE_2.0.16)(64bit)
>  pro: libSDL2-2.0.so.0(SUSE_2.0.18)(64bit)
>  pro: libSDL2-2.0.so.0(SUSE_2.0.22)(64bit)
>  pro: libSDL2-2.0.so.0(SUSE_2.0.5)(64bit)
>  pro: libSDL2-2.0.so.0(SUSE_2.0.6)(64bit)
>  pro: libSDL2-2.0.so.0(SUSE_2.0.7)(64bit)
>  pro: libSDL2-2.0.so.0(SUSE_2.0.8)(64bit)
>  pro: libSDL2-2.0.so.0(SUSE_2.0.9)(64bit)