(In reply to Wolfgang Bauer from comment #8) > (In reply to Frank Kruger from comment #6) > > cdrskin is a limited cdrecord compatibility wrapper, so I would stick to > > cdrecord. Is there any good reason against it? > > Against sticking to cdrecord? > Not that I know, except that mentioned message on k3b's startup... > > AFAIK the cdrskin developer helped with implementing the support in k3b > though (and fix other bugs), maybe that's the reason why it would be > preferred now. k3b with cdrecord just works for me for years, so why should I switch to cdrskin? I do not see any improvment in using cdrskin.