Comment # 8 on bug 1122797 from Wolfgang Bauer

(In reply to Luca Beltrame from comment #7)
> (In reply to Matthias Gerstner from comment #6)
> 
> > Another approach, that was suggest for qpdfview in bug 1122801 could be to
> > package this spectre plugin separately, this would be the files:
> 
> This would be probably the best in my view. Like this, there's no "broken"
> functionality, but at the same time, the defaults offer increased security
> against the problems in gs.

That's what I would prefer as well.

There is one "broken" functionality without the libspectre/ghostscript plugin:
Print Preview requires it to work.

If it's in a separate package, users who want/need to have the Print Preview
functionality can at least still install it.