Comment # 20 on bug 1198794 from
(In reply to Fridrich Strba from comment #19)
> (In reply to Fridrich Strba from comment #18)
> > No problem. As long as it enters the Printing quickly and I can scan, I
> > don't care which patch it is :)
> 
> Actually, I meant Publishing. Just what puzzles me is that there is this
> problem that prevents hpaio to be loaded. There is a known fix and a working
> submission. Yet the hplip package is happily unfixed. I understand that
> automatic submission to Factory is not so good for big projects. That is why
> I don't do it in Java:packages either. Just this means that the OBS
> repositories will be full of branched hplip packages with different slightly
> different fixes and the main package in rubbles :/ sigh

Yeah, now, that I'm co-maintaining this package, I will try to address this. 

In fact, it went to Factory too quick this time. We gave ecsos update the
precedence, and I was about to test it (but I was distracted from my day job).
During preparation, I noticed your submission.

Submitted to Factory a minute ago.


You are receiving this mail because: