Comment # 11 on bug 1172521 from Dominique Leuenberger

(In reply to Marketa Calabkova from comment #3)
> > Since this is pretty old code looking like some update cleanup, I question
> > if we need that at all or couldn't remove it completely.
> 
> "pretty old"? How old? Could you please point me to an exact revision? AFAIK
> there is no "osc blame", so I can not find it myself.

There actyally IS osc blame:

> osc blame openSUSE:Factory timezone timezone.spec

>   1 (unknown      2007-08-09 10:05:51    91) %post
>  64 (namtrac      2012-09-14 10:40:45    92) if [ ! -L /usr/share/zoneinfo/posixrules ]; then
>  64 (namtrac      2012-09-14 10:40:45    93)    rm -f /usr/share/zoneinfo/posixrules
>  64 (namtrac      2012-09-14 10:40:45    94)    ln -sf /etc/localtime /usr/share/zoneinfo/posixrules
>  64 (namtrac      2012-09-14 10:40:45    95) fi
>  64 (namtrac      2012-09-14 10:40:45    96) if [ -e /usr/share/zoneinfo/posixrules.rpmnew ]; then
>  64 (namtrac      2012-09-14 10:40:45    97)    rm -f /usr/share/zoneinfo/posixrules.rpmnew
>  64 (namtrac      2012-09-14 10:40:45    98) fi

NOTE: 'namtrac' was the user performing the checkin to openSUSE:Factory, not
the user performing the change.

osc log openSUSE:Factory timezone | grep r64
r64 | namtrac | 2012-09-14 10:40:45 | 31e18058332c8b031d5431080d4a5b05 | 2012f
| rq134187

=> change came to Factory via SR 134187;  osc rq show -d 134187