Comment # 14 on bug 1218620 from Dario Faggioli

(In reply to Stefan Brüns from comment #12)
> (In reply to Dario Faggioli from comment #11)
> > (In reply to Ludwig Nussel from comment #10)
> > > In the end we need canokey-qemu fixed.
> > >
> > Indeed. In fact, this --canokey-qemu not building, I mean-- is even blocking
> > QEMU 8.2 from getting into Factory (which I need it for SLE15-SP6, for
> > confidential computing stuff, and for other things)...
> 
> 1. There is a pending SR (1140009) to fix the canokey-qemu build, without
> bad side effects on the rest of the distribution. The SR has not received
> any attention, yet ...
>
Ok, cool, thanks.

> 2. As far as I understand, canokey-qemu is a new, and optional dependency of
> qemu.
>
Well, yes, it's optional. And in Factory/Tumbleweed, we opt for it. :-)

> 3. SLE had and still has '-Wl,--no-undefined' set in the linker flags, so
> trying to build canokey-qemu on SLE will fail.
> 
The package is not even there in SLE, AFAIK. In fact, in SLE, canokey support
is disabled, so this should not be a problem