Comment # 14 on bug 938659 from Markus Elfring

(In reply to Dr. Werner Fink from comment #12)
> For me this looks like the printer with the wrong permissions and owner ship
> is not part of something like a data base (e.g. /usr/share/usb.ids) and/or
> is missing hint in its vendor description that it *is* a printer.

Is there any software component which depends still on the repetition of a
device type in the product name?

How many device attributes should be usually checked for ordinary system
operation?

Do you know any similar configuration challenges from other device domains?