Comment # 2 on bug 1161873 from Richard Biener

(In reply to Aaron Puchert from comment #1)
> That's correct. What do you think about splitting this into llvm-vim-plugins
> and clang-vim-plugins, and renaming llvm-emacs-plugins to
> clang-emacs-plugins?
> 
> Integrating the vim-plugins with the llvm package has the issue that we
> install files into /usr/share/vim, which might be a bit weird if vim is not
> installed.

Maybe "weird" but the files are quite small and IMHO not worth the complexity
of yet another set of packages.  But yes, that works for me as well.