Comment # 6 on bug 1179945 from Dominique Leuenberger

(In reply to Bruno Friedmann from comment #5)
> Thanks R(In reply to Reinhard Max from comment #4)
> > Then I see no problem, because PostgreSQL 10 or older wouldn't have been on
> > SLE16 anyway, and all existing SLE releases just got PostgreSQL 13 as their
> > default version (SLE15-SP3) or as an optional maintenance upgrade (all
> > others), so there is an upgrade path.
> 
> Thanks for this clear path to what we should expect.
> 
> @Dominique should we start removing building for 9x and 10x in multibuild to
> allow the removal, or should we create another meta bug pointing to this
> one. (In this case I would designate Reinhard as leader of this new bug)

If removing pgsql10 is what the maintainers consider most sensible, this
clearly sounds like the way to go. Would raise the question though if and why
we want to keep pgsql < 10 in TW, or if we should not rather clean up a bit
more