Comment # 1 on bug 1204697 from
If we ship the .o files in a package, the LTO bits should indeed be stripped,
otherwise users with slightly different compiler would find them unusable too. 
But in this case:

1) Should the .o files be built with LTO at all?  I.e. do we use them also in
the build process to link with something to build a program or a shared object?
 If not, I'd suggest switching LTO off for them.

2) If yes, they need to be built with -ffat-lto-objects - are they?

3) After the stripping, what do they look like, what sectins do they still
contain?


You are receiving this mail because: