(In reply to Andrei Borzenkov from comment #4) > (In reply to Ond��ej S��kup from comment #3) > > *** Bug 1046969 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** > > Well, mentioned bug contained workaround (confirmed as working by multiple > people); this workaround also gave rather good hint for the problem root > cause. > > Mostly for the benefit of other users reading this bug report that offers > neither ... Sorry for closing first report :( I unfortunately saw first this report.