Comment # 4 on bug 965542 from
Is the filesystem on the server ext3 or ext4?

If you use
  tune2fs -O ^dir_index /dev/sdWHATEVER

to turn off dir_index on that filesystem, does the problem go away?

If "yes" to both of those, then you are hitting a design bug in the ext3/4
directory indexing.

Is the server running a 3.3 or older kernel?  If so then an upgrade
will turn the bug from a 32bit-collision possibility into a 64bit collision
possibility, which makes it much less likely to hit (but doesn't really solve
it).

If the above doesn't seem to explain it, then I would need kernel version on
server, filesystem details on server, and a tcpdump trace (-s 0) for the "ls
-l" attempt.

The NFSv3/NFSv4 difference is probably because they fit different numbers of
entries into a reply.  The problem particularly occurs if the last name in one
reply and the first name in the next reply hash to the same value (or something
like that).


You are receiving this mail because: