(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > The new situation is that it considers functions without > target attribute to be decorated with the effective target options of the > compilation. This would explain the situation, but the gcc invocation does not have any target options. I tried to remove all unnecessary options and the error is still happening with gcc invocation looking like this (removed -D, -I and -W options for brevity): gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -g -c gen4_vertex.c -fPIC -o .libs/gen4_vertex.o (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #11) > I wonder whether the package > uses any of the -ffast-math options and thus if we could relax this > condition with -funsafe-math-optimizations or so. As far as I can see it does not use -ffast-math (as parameter or attribute). I tried adding either -fexcess-precision=standard or -funsafe-math-optimizations, but it still reports the same error.