Comment # 3 on bug 1205894 from Thorsten Kukuk

(In reply to Axel Braun from comment #2)

> So we have 2 point:
> - you are saying that /var/www is the wrong place - which is the right one?

There is no correct one, this depends on the use case. But everything delivered
by an RPM and outside /usr will create problems.

> - that still does not justify that automount of /var deletes everything....

That the package does not follow FHS does not justify it, correct, but that you
mount /var on a t-u system justifies that you loose data.
That's unavoidable, as t-u needs /var but you overwrite it with an outdated
version.
That's why I suggested to Ignaz to abort with a hard error if somebody makes
this mistake and to you to only mount /var/www, not complete /var.

Between, I would not follow RHEL5 documentation, that's like following SLES10
or openSUSE 10.3 documentation, completely outdated.

> Current location was triggered after the discussion in boo#1204307

And in this discussion I wrote that /var/www is the same bad idea then
/srv/www.