(In reply to Klaus K��mpf from comment #18) > A /usr/lib/zypp/plugins/commit/*susemanager* plugin must not be part of > Salt. In this respect, I agree with the original reporter. > > However, a generic /usr/lib/zypp/plugins/commit/*salt_notifier*, together > with a respective 'yum' notifier (for Fedora/RHEL, 'apt' will follow later) > might be part of Salt You say "must not be part of Salt", then you say "might be part of Salt", which already is anyway. My point is, this is not something one just takes and changes on his own alone, but must be *team* discussion prior that and clear knowledge, reflecting in the RFC we *agreed*: https://github.com/SUSE/susemanager-rfc/blob/master/text/00003-salt-package-installation.md#handling-the-external-tools ��� please note, this section is about Zypper + Salt. The name is probably an issue, but I find it a low priority, because the content of the plugin won't change. Additionally, this part nor affects overall package functionality neither is directly user-land tooling whether generic users must use "susemanager" script directly, hence this makes the task even lower priority. However, abruptly splitting without looking through the consequences and verification by support team is what I find certainly wrong.