+1 for renaming back to `nf-config` -- this is the standard name that many build tools will be looking for. As far as I can tell, OpenSUSE is the only OS that names it this way. The package name is a little bit confusing too: - nc-config is provided by netcdf-devel - ncxx4-config is provided by netcdf-cxx4-tools - nf-fortran-config is provided by netcdf-fortran_4_5_3-gnu-hpc Would it be possible to have the `*-config` utilities be provided by the `*-devel` packages? It's not clear to me why they are packaged separately. Even having them as recommended packages would be useful. >> Separately, there is no non-environment module `netcdf-fortran` package. > No, there isn't. This is not a bug. Please could you say why this is? Clearly there's a reason, but I find it a bit confusing that there are non-environment module versions of the C and C++ libraries, just not for Fortran. The .mod files obviously depend on the compiler, but I would expect the system package to require the system compiler. `hdf5-devel`, for example, does include the Fortran .mod files in the non-module package.