Comment # 26 on bug 909912 from Thomas Blume

(In reply to Olaf Hering from comment #24)
> (In reply to Thomas Blume from comment #23)
> > Maybe it's worth a feature request?
> 
> Why is this a feature? Its a clear regression!
> 
> In 11.4 the crypt branch just waited for the specified timeout (In fact it
> was not a branch, but a step). Once it returned with failure or success the
> following steps just used what was available.
> 
> To get that back the fstab thing has to depend on crypt. There is no need
> for timeout or anything in fstab. The fstab step just has to reuse what
> earlier steps provide.
> 
> I will double check if your suggested timeout values actually work. In my
> testing they dont, and a value of zero does actually nothing.

It should work, see:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861123