Comment # 40 on bug 938659 from
(In reply to Johannes Meixner from comment #37)
> In contrast

I found the file comparison by a tool like KDiff3 helpful in my case.


> The rule in your comment#36 applies to any Kyocera devices
> and because 51-android.rules is alpabetically after 50-udev-default.rules
> the 51-android.rules are applied after the ones in 50-udev-default.rules.

I needed a while to become aware of this configuration detail.


> There is no bug in udev.

There are still some open issues also in this software.
But I can acknowledge so far that the shown rule evaluation works completely as
it was designed.


> It works exactly as the udev rules on your Tumbleweed system specify.

Yes.


> The root cause is in the package that provides 51-android.rules
> because it contains a rule that applies to any Kyocera devices.
> I cannot decide if that rule is right or wrong.

Did I stumble on a target conflict for the determination of appropriate device
permissions?



> At least for Kyocera USB printers it seems to be wrong because
> it makes normal usage by the printing system (via user lp group lp)
> impossible - but I cannot decide if that it intended.

Will there any more fine-tuning be needed for the affected settings?


> # rpm -qf /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/51-android.rules

android-tools-4.2.2_r1-7.2.x86_64


> # rpm -qi <RPM_package_name>

Install Date: Tue Mar  3 18:04:33 2015
Build Date  : Sat Jan 31 00:35:37 2015
Build Host  : build08


You are receiving this mail because: