Comment # 6 on bug 1222429 from Jiri Slaby

(In reply to Wenruo Qu from comment #5)
> Personally speaking, if you're going to use "rescue=" option, your fs is
> already screwed up on most cases.
> 
> Furthermore, most rescue= options would require ro mount option, and can not
> be remounted to RW, this is by design.
> 
> So I do not think we need "norecovery" mount option for btrfs at all.

I have no idea :). Talk to yast people in here...

> Any more explanation on the "norecovery" mount option usage? Maybe I'm
> missing something critical.

So see also:
(In reply to Ancor Gonzalez Sosa from comment #2)
> For context, the usage of "norecovery" during upgrade was introduced here:
> https://github.com/yast/yast-update/pull/180