September 2021 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1189092] guile fails with glibc 2.34
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 09 Sep '21

09 Sep '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189092 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189092#c6 Martin Li��ka <martin.liska(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Martin Li��ka <martin.liska(a)suse.com> --- Should be fixed in devel project. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1189079] [META] glibc 2.34 packages failures
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 09 Sep '21

09 Sep '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189079 Bug 1189079 depends on bug 1189092, which changed state. Bug 1189092 Summary: guile fails with glibc 2.34 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189092 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1189094] libhugetlbfs fails with glibc 2.34
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 09 Sep '21

09 Sep '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189094 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189094#c5 --- Comment #5 from Martin Li��ka <martin.liska(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Thomas Renninger from comment #4) > Thanks a lot Martin! Thanks! > I'll have a look how this is going to be handled mainline in the future. Apparently, there will be some direct support in glibc: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/list/?series=2732 > I expect glibc 2.34 is not an option for SLE 15 SP4. Then this version > (morecore func missing) must not be backported and must not show up there. No, it shouldn't land in SLE15. > > Setting to resolved, all the work done and credits go to Martin! No, the credits go to the patch author, not me :P -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1189079] [META] glibc 2.34 packages failures
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 09 Sep '21

09 Sep '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189079 Bug 1189079 depends on bug 1189094, which changed state. Bug 1189094 Summary: libhugetlbfs fails with glibc 2.34 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189094 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1189094] libhugetlbfs fails with glibc 2.34
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 09 Sep '21

09 Sep '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189094 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189094#c4 Thomas Renninger <trenn(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED CC| |trenn(a)suse.com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Thomas Renninger <trenn(a)suse.com> --- Thanks a lot Martin! I'll have a look how this is going to be handled mainline in the future. I expect glibc 2.34 is not an option for SLE 15 SP4. Then this version (morecore func missing) must not be backported and must not show up there. Setting to resolved, all the work done and credits go to Martin! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1189480] systemd-udevd.service fails with undefined symbol: fchmod_and_chown
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 09 Sep '21

09 Sep '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189480 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189480#c4 --- Comment #4 from OBSbugzilla Bot <bwiedemann+obsbugzillabot(a)suse.com> --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (1189480) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/917666 Factory / systemd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1190332] New: Problem with "normal g`\"" in suse.vimrc in case g is already in use
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 09 Sep '21

09 Sep '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1190332 Bug ID: 1190332 Summary: Problem with "normal g`\"" in suse.vimrc in case g is already in use Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: All OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: werner(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- I have received a bug report via mail from Enno Nagel: <cite> in der Datei /usr/share/vim/vim80/suse.vimrc (vormals /etc/vimrc) befindet sich seit geraumer Zeit der autocmd autocmd BufReadPost * \ if line("'\"") > 0 && line("'\"") <= line("$") \ && expand("%") !~ "COMMIT_EDITMSG" \ && expand("%") !~ "ADD_EDIT.patch" \ && expand("%") !~ "addp-hunk-edit.diff" \ && expand("%") !~ "git-rebase-todo" | \ exe "normal g`\"" | \ endif Der Befehl normal g` anstelle von normal! g` f�hrt dabei dazu, dass jeder Anweder, der g` durch n(ore)map anders bindet, eine Fehlermeldung beim �ffnen jedes Buffers erh�lt. Daher w�re es vorzuziehen, den autocmd nicht zu laden. </cite> it looks like Enno uses in its own ~/.vimrc a line with n(ore)map on g` which interferes with the autocmd in suse.vimrc Shoudn't we use "normal! g`\"" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1173326] New: /etc/vimrc left in place
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 09 Sep '21

09 Sep '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173326 Bug ID: 1173326 Summary: /etc/vimrc left in place Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: lnussel(a)suse.com Reporter: lnussel(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de CC: idonmez(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- after not shipping /etc/vimrc anymore the previous one is not removed and causes duplicate definition of *.spec file handler -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1184654] System with less than 4 GiB available memory - Btrfs not suitable
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 09 Sep '21

09 Sep '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184654 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184654#c3 Lukas Kucharczyk <lukas.kucharczyk(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Lukas Kucharczyk <lukas.kucharczyk(a)suse.com> --- I have added a note about performance degradation on systems with low amount of RAM and on regular hard disks: https://github.com/openSUSE/release-notes-openSUSE/commit/faa204803b8e5df46… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1189092] guile fails with glibc 2.34
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 09 Sep '21

09 Sep '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189092 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189092#c5 --- Comment #5 from Martin Li��ka <martin.liska(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Dominique Leuenberger from comment #4) > (In reply to Martin Li��ka from comment #3) > > @DimStar: Can you please cherry-pick the patch? > > I was actually hoping for the maintainer to do so - but�� > > I'll have a look Any progress on this, please? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0