May 2021 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1091516] gdm login screen is scaled to 200% apparently
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 17 May '21

17 May '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091516 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091516#c12 --- Comment #12 from Richard Wallwork <richwallwork(a)pm.me> --- To test this issue on a different system, I installed Gnome Tumbleweed on a spare drive of my desktop. The monitor is 32" 4k,a ppi of 138. Scaling was at 1x for both login screen and desktop. If ppi is a fixed value based on the monitors size and pixel resolution, and dpi is (depending on DE/WM used), a value that can be set manually, is it likely that mutter is looking at the ppi when determining when to scale to 1x or 2x rather than the dpi? If so, 144 may not the right value to use I wonder? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1186127] New: selinux-ready error
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 17 May '21

17 May '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1186127 Bug ID: 1186127 Summary: selinux-ready error Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: MicroOS Assignee: kubic-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: lnussel(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- SELinux works fine but # selinux-ready Start checking your system if it is selinux-ready or not: check_dir: OK. /sys/fs/selinux exists. check_filesystem: OK. Filesystem 'securityfs' exists. check_filesystem: OK. Filesystem 'selinuxfs' exists. check_boot: Assuming GRUB2 as bootloader. check_boot: OK. Current kernel 'vmlinuz-5.12.3-1-default' has boot-parameters 'security=selinux selinux=1' check_boot: OK. Other kernels with correct parameters: /usr/sbin/selinux-ready: Zeile 140: [: Zu viele Argumente. check_mkinitrd: ERR. Your initrd seems not to mount /proc of the root filesystem during boot and/or load_policy is missing, this may be a reason for SELinux not working. check_packages: ERR. Package 'restorecond' not installed, please run 'zypper in restorecond' as root check_config: OK. Config file seems to be there. check_config: OK. SELINUX is set to 'enforcing'. check_pam: OK. Your PAM configuration seems to be correct. check_runlevel: ERR. please enable restorecond with systemctl enable restorecond.service. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1186125] MicroOS snapshot 20210515 CoreDNS fails to resolve external addresses
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 17 May '21

17 May '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186125 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186125#c2 --- Comment #2 from Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk(a)suse.com> --- Somebody removed a workaround from 10-kubeadm.conf. Reverting the kubernets1.21-kubeadm package should be enough to get it working again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1186040] gdb crash internal-error: jit_event_handler
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 17 May '21

17 May '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186040 Michael Matz <matz(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matz(a)suse.com Assignee|matz(a)suse.com |tdevries(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1186093] [Build 20210514] [s390x] openQA test fails in welcome because of missing line of the frame around the license above (ncurses)
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 17 May '21

17 May '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186093 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186093#c9 Steffen Winterfeldt <snwint(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|YaST2 |Other Assignee|yast2-maintainers(a)suse.de |screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de QA Contact|jsrain(a)suse.com |qa-bugs(a)suse.de --- Comment #9 from Steffen Winterfeldt <snwint(a)suse.com> --- Not sure who to assign this to. I couldn't spot an openqa product in bugzilla. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1186125] MicroOS snapshot 20210515 CoreDNS fails to resolve external addresses
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 17 May '21

17 May '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186125 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186125#c1 --- Comment #1 from Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk(a)suse.com> --- It's not CoreDNS, but CoreDNS is an affected service, too. Something in kubernetes reports timeouts and does not answer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1186093] [Build 20210514] [s390x] openQA test fails in welcome because of missing line of the frame around the license above (ncurses)
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 17 May '21

17 May '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186093 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186093#c8 Steffen Winterfeldt <snwint(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(ada.lovelace@gmx. | |de) | --- Comment #8 from Steffen Winterfeldt <snwint(a)suse.com> --- I've just run this ISO on an s390x and the screen looks fine. So this looks like an openqa test setup related issue to me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1186087] Java:packages/resteasy: CVE-2016-9606 CVE-2020-1695 CVE-2020-25633
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 17 May '21

17 May '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186087 Pedro Monreal Gonzalez <pmonrealgonzalez(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pmonrealgonzalez(a)suse.com, | |security-team(a)suse.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1181307] New: xsane request root password for polkit permission
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 17 May '21

17 May '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1181307 Bug ID: 1181307 Summary: xsane request root password for polkit permission Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: hpj(a)urpla.net QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- After setting up an avision scanner with yast successfully, every time, the user is executing xsane, the system queries for root permission for a polkit action: org.freedesktop.systemd1.manage-units. Why? User can dismiss query, and xsane is working fine. Specific setup: $ sane-find-scanner # sane-find-scanner will now attempt to detect your scanner. If the # result is different from what you expected, first make sure your # scanner is powered up and properly connected to your computer. # No SCSI scanners found. If you expected something different, make sure that # you have loaded a kernel SCSI driver for your SCSI adapter. found USB scanner (vendor=0x0638, product=0x0a5e) at libusb:001:004 # Your USB scanner was (probably) detected. It may or may not be supported by # SANE. Try scanimage -L and read the backend's manpage. # Not checking for parallel port scanners. # Most Scanners connected to the parallel port or other proprietary ports # can't be detected by this program. udev sets up this device just fine: $ getfacl /dev/bus/usb/001/004 getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: dev/bus/usb/001/004 # owner: root # group: root user::rw- user:username:rw- group::rw- group:lirc:rw- mask::rw- other::rw- How scanning is related to lirc escapes me. According to /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/55-libsane.rules, the group is "lp" for such devices. Therefor, I added the additional lp group to username. The whole issue boils down to: why is polkit querying for root permissions? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1092425] New: Assertion failure in libclang on i586 (when building qtdoc)
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 17 May '21

17 May '21

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092425 Bug ID: 1092425 Summary: Assertion failure in libclang on i586 (when building qtdoc) Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: fvogt(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- This appears when building KDE:Qt:5.11/libqt5-qtdoc. 100% reproducible on i586, never fails on x86_64. /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/qt-everywhere-src-5.11.0-rc/qtbase/src/corelib/qdoc_wrapper.sh -outputdir /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/qt-everywhere-src-5.11.0-rc/qtbase/doc/qtcore -installdir /usr/share/doc/packages/qt5 /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/qt-everywhere-src-5.11.0-rc/qtbase/src/corelib/doc/qtcore.qdocconf -prepare -no-link-errors -I. -Iglobal -I../3rdparty/harfbuzz/src -I../3rdparty/md5 -I../3rdparty/md4 -I../3rdparty/sha3 -I../3rdparty/forkfd -I../../include -I../../include/QtCore -I../../include/QtCore/5.11.0 -I../../include/QtCore/5.11.0/QtCore -I.moc -I.tracegen -isystem /usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I../../mkspecs/linux-g++ [ 348s] QT_HASH_SEED: forced seed value is not 0, cannot guarantee that the hashing functions will produce a stable value.qdoc: ../tools/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTWriter.cpp:4046: void clang::ASTWriter::GenerateNameLookupTable(const clang::DeclContext *, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char> &): Assertion `ConversionNameSet.empty() && "Failed to find all of the visible " "conversion functions by walking all " "the lexical members of the context."' failed. [ 348s] libclang: crash detected during AST saving: { [ 348s] 'filename' : '/tmp/qdoc_pch.PWbpkA/QtCore.pch' [ 348s] 'options' : 0, [ 348s] } [ 348s] qdoc: ../include/llvm/Bitcode/BitstreamWriter.h:90: llvm::BitstreamWriter::~BitstreamWriter(): Assertion `BlockScope.empty() && CurAbbrevs.empty() && "Block imbalance"' failed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 15