March 2021 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1182925] New: suse-release / suse-release-oss is missleading as SLE does have such provide at all
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Mar '21

02 Mar '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182925 Bug ID: 1182925 Summary: suse-release / suse-release-oss is missleading as SLE does have such provide at all Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.2 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Patterns Assignee: lubos.kocman(a)suse.com Reporter: lubos.kocman(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Hello Neal Gompa recently raised question about suse-release Provides in Leap/SLE as 15 SP3 Backports fail on installcheck while openSUSE Leap release package (still) has such provides. Background: Seems like from SLE point of view there could have been a package in the past. But generally in SLE15 code base sle never provided suse-release. See line 107 https://build.suse.de/package/view_file/SUSE:SLE-15-SP3:GA/000package-group… # create /etc/SuSE-release - deprecated, FATE#316268 # no longer build, in case you wonder Why do I suggest removal? My problem is that it seems to provide expectation that all SUSE family products and project have suse-release and that is not the case. Could we get rid of these misleading provides (suse-release, suse-release-oss)? https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_guidelines https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_for_Leap These articles do not reference them at all. I did grep all of openSUSE:Leap:15.3 and openSUSE:Backports:SLE-15-SP3 and this was the result: lkocman@localhost:/mnt/obs> grep suse-release openSUSE*/*/*.spec openSUSE:Leap:15.3/000release-packages/Leap-release.spec:Provides: suse-release = %{version}-%{release} openSUSE:Leap:15.3/000release-packages/Leap-release.spec:Provides: suse-release-oss = %{version}-%{release} -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1182835] systemctl --user not working
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Mar '21

02 Mar '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182835 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182835#c4 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Vogt <fvogt(a)suse.com> --- How did you create the user and log in? How do you run "systemctl --user"? I have the suspicion that you're running "sudo systemctl --user" or similar, which can't work and would explain those issues. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1182913] New: OBS is not resolving some dependencies from binary DEB package
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Mar '21

02 Mar '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182913 Bug ID: 1182913 Summary: OBS is not resolving some dependencies from binary DEB package Classification: Internal Novell Products Product: openSUSE Build Service Version: master Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: build process Assignee: mls(a)suse.com Reporter: victor.zhestkov(a)suse.com QA Contact: adrian.schroeter(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- Hi Team. The project: systemsmanagement:saltstack:bundle:Ubuntu-20.04 Package `python3-pytest` was build and there are the following dependencies inside DEB file: python3-atomicwrites (>= 1.0) python3-attrs (>= 17.4.0) python3-importlib-metadata (>= 0.12) python3-more-itertools (>= 4.0.0) python3-packaging python3-pluggy (>= 0.12) python3-py (>= 1.5.0) python3-setuptools python3-six (>= 1.10.0) But `osc buildinfo -d systemsmanagement:saltstack:bundle:Ubuntu-20.04 python-simplejson Ubuntu_20.04 x86_64` shows the following: ... added python3-pytest@systemsmanagement:saltstack:bundle:Ubuntu-20.04/Ubuntu_20.04 because of python3-pytest (direct dep) added python3-packaging@systemsmanagement:saltstack:bundle:Ubuntu-20.04/Ubuntu_20.04 because of python3-pytest:python3-packaging added python3-atomicwrites@systemsmanagement:saltstack:bundle:Ubuntu-20.04/Ubuntu_20.04 because of python3-pytest:python3-atomicwrites >= 1.0 added python3-attrs@systemsmanagement:saltstack:bundle:Ubuntu-20.04/Ubuntu_20.04 because of python3-pytest:python3-attrs >= 17.4.0 added python3-more-itertools@systemsmanagement:saltstack:bundle:Ubuntu-20.04/Ubuntu_20.04 because of python3-pytest:python3-more-itertools >= 4.0.0 added python3-pluggy@systemsmanagement:saltstack:bundle:Ubuntu-20.04/Ubuntu_20.04 because of python3-pytest:python3-pluggy >= 0.12 added python3-py@systemsmanagement:saltstack:bundle:Ubuntu-20.04/Ubuntu_20.04 because of python3-pytest:python3-py >= 1.5.0 added python3-six@systemsmanagement:saltstack:bundle:Ubuntu-20.04/Ubuntu_20.04 because of python3-pytest:python3-six >= 1.10.0 ... python3-importlib-metadata and python3-setuptools are missing. It leads to fails during the building of some packages in the project. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1182212] request to add susepaste to installation system on rescue media
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Mar '21

02 Mar '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182212 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182212#c1 Ancor Gonzalez Sosa <ancor(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ancor(a)suse.com, | |snwint(a)suse.com Flags| |needinfo?(snwint(a)suse.com) --- Comment #1 from Ancor Gonzalez Sosa <ancor(a)suse.com> --- I hope that makes it https://github.com/openSUSE/installation-images/pull/463 Asking for Steffen's review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1182548] Prosody XMPP server doesnt handle A/V calls correctly
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Mar '21

02 Mar '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182548 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182548#c4 --- Comment #4 from Petr Kristof <kristof.p(a)fce.vutbr.cz> --- Dear Michael, Im a end user, so technical description of problem may not be exact. Kind people from Conversation support channel suggested me to update mod_csi_simple, what solved A/V ringing_on_background problem with Prosody. I did extract this patch from Fedora package and attached it in hope it will be usefull. Not know HG system and never work with it. Thank you very much for your work -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1175362] New: GCC fix for out-of-line atomics fallback on non-LSE systems
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Mar '21

02 Mar '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1175362 Bug ID: 1175362 Summary: GCC fix for out-of-line atomics fallback on non-LSE systems Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: aarch64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Development Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: guillaume.gardet(a)arm.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de CC: afaerber(a)suse.com, dmueller(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- A patch [0] fixes wrong registers being employed in non-LSE fallback, 128b CAS Acquire+Release. The problem is encountered when '-moutline-atomics' flag is used. This is enabled by default with gcc10. Commit ids: Gcc-10: fd2ec4542fd2975e6d3f2f1c1a2639945a84f9e1 Gcc-9: 4e91af9877df9e6b28ea8e50ae9445590363d5b0 Gcc-8: 3e2d69ee245e5a44c53cae27a797b97ba529eb72 [0]: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=fd2ec4542fd2975e6d3f2f1c1… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1182900] AutoYaST reports: Extra element online_update_configuration in interleave"
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Mar '21

02 Mar '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182900 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182900#c9 Ancor Gonzalez Sosa <ancor(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(vetter(a)physik.uni | |-wuerzburg.de) --- Comment #9 from Ancor Gonzalez Sosa <ancor(a)suse.com> --- Please confirm whether everything works after removing the incorrect "category_filter" section and the surplus "<image/>" tag. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1182901] [Build 91.1] Grub snapshots does not display any sort of identifier for user defined snapshot.
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Mar '21

02 Mar '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182901 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182901#c4 Anton Smorodskyi <anton.smorodskyi(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID Flags|needinfo?(anton.smorodskyi@ | |suse.com) | --- Comment #4 from Anton Smorodskyi <anton.smorodskyi(a)suse.com> --- Not sure why it is posted as product bug . it is pure needling issue due to design / font changes . I created proper needle and restarted the job. It suppose to pass now https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1652168 . Side note : I am not sure how I got into Maintainers list for this bug. I was never involved in something related to BTRFS testing. I was able to help only because it was simple needling issue in case of more complex problems I really have small chances to help with snapper/BTRFS -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1169099] [Build 20200405][aarch64] crash: cannot determine VA_BITS_ACTUAL: please use /proc/kcore
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Mar '21

02 Mar '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169099 Vincent Moutoussamy <vmoutoussamy(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sweiberg(a)suse.com, | |vmoutoussamy(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1182821] New: [Build 20210226] openQA test fails in firewall_enabled
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Mar '21

02 Mar '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1182821 Bug ID: 1182821 Summary: [Build 20210226] openQA test fails in firewall_enabled Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other URL: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1647530/modules/fire wall_enabled/steps/1 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Installation Assignee: yast2-maintainers(a)suse.de Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: jsrain(a)suse.com Found By: openQA Blocker: Yes ## Observation openQA test in scenario opensuse-Tumbleweed-DVD-x86_64-minimalx@64bit fails in [firewall_enabled](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1647530/modules/firewal… ## Test suite description MAX_JOB_TIME for bypass poo#44408 Snapshot 0226 is the one where the large yast stack changes were merged; since this version, the system, after being installed, has the firewall disabled, even though the confirmation screen (yast installation overview) still claimed to have the firewall enabled. This is a major regression that blocks Tumbleweed snapshots from going out; we do not want to leave all fresh installs unprotected ## Reproducible Fails since (at least) Build [20210225](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1646617) ## Expected result Last good: [20210223](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1644628) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=opensus… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4