August 2020 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1133277] New: LTO: protobuf abuild fails
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 23 Mar '23

23 Mar '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1133277 Bug ID: 1133277 Summary: LTO: protobuf abuild fails Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: martin.liska(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Fails due to: [ 233s] + ../src/protoc --java_out=core/src/main/java -I../src ../src/google/protobuf/descriptor.proto [ 233s] terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::system_error' [ 233s] what(): Unknown error -1 [ 233s] /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.IcJGkF: line 61: 9707 Aborted ../src/protoc --java_out=core/src/main/java -I../src ../src/google/protobuf/descriptor.proto #0 0x00007ffff7e3fd8b in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x00007ffff7e29549 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #2 0x00007ffff7aad63f in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 #3 0x00007ffff7ab8f38 in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 #4 0x00007ffff7ab8f83 in std::terminate() () from /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 #5 0x00007ffff7ab91b4 in __cxa_throw () from /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 #6 0x00007ffff7ab0156 in std::__throw_system_error(int) () from /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 #7 0x00007ffff792741b in std::call_once<void (&)()> (__once=..., __f=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/9/x86_64-suse-linux/bits/gthr-default.h:700 #8 0x00007ffff77fbb83 in global constructors keyed to 65535_0_bytestream.o.132584 () at ./google/protobuf/repeated_field.h:428 #9 0x00007ffff7fe276a in call_init.part () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 #10 0x00007ffff7fe2866 in _dl_init () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 #11 0x00007ffff7fd40ca in _dl_start_user () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 #12 0x0000000000000004 in ?? () #13 0x00007fffffffeb14 in ?? () #14 0x00007fffffffeb50 in ?? () #15 0x00007fffffffeb6e in ?? () #16 0x00007fffffffeb77 in ?? () #17 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/issues/5923 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 4

[Bug 1133283] New: LTO: rust build fails
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 23 Mar '23

23 Mar '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1133283 Bug ID: 1133283 Summary: LTO: rust build fails Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: martin.liska(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Fails due to: [ 4348s] = note: /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/9/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/rustc-1.33.0-src/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libstd-1315fc6ffe54b9a7.rlib(std-1315fc6ffe54b9a7.std.3yju5qwd-cgu.2.rcgu.o): in function `std::sys_common::gnu::libbacktrace::foreach_symbol_fileline': [ 4348s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/rustc-1.33.0-src/src/libstd/sys_common/gnu/libbacktrace.rs:33: undefined reference to `__rdos_backtrace_pcinfo' [ 4348s] /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/9/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/rustc-1.33.0-src/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libstd-1315fc6ffe54b9a7.rlib(std-1315fc6ffe54b9a7.std.3yju5qwd-cgu.2.rcgu.o): in function `std::sys_common::gnu::libbacktrace::init_state': [ 4348s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/rustc-1.33.0-src/src/libstd/sys_common/gnu/libbacktrace.rs:169: undefined reference to `__rdos_backtrace_create_state' [ 4348s] /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/9/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/rustc-1.33.0-src/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libstd-1315fc6ffe54b9a7.rlib(std-1315fc6ffe54b9a7.std.3yju5qwd-cgu.2.rcgu.o): in function `std::sys_common::gnu::libbacktrace::resolve_symname': [ 4348s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/rustc-1.33.0-src/src/libstd/sys_common/gnu/libbacktrace.rs:72: undefined reference to `__rdos_backtrace_syminfo' [ 4348s] /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/9/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/rustc-1.33.0-src/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libstd-1315fc6ffe54b9a7.rlib(std-1315fc6ffe54b9a7.std.3yju5qwd-cgu.2.rcgu.o): in function `std::sys_common::gnu::libbacktrace::resolve_symname': [ 4348s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/rustc-1.33.0-src/src/libstd/sys_common/gnu/libbacktrace.rs:72: undefined reference to `__rdos_backtrace_syminfo' [ 4348s] collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status [ 4348s] [ 4348s] [ 4348s] error: aborting due to previous error [ 4348s] [ 4348s] error: Could not compile `rustc-rayon-core`. [ 4348s] warning: build failed, waiting for other jobs to finish... [ 4350s] error: linking with `cc` failed: exit code: 1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 3

[Bug 1135030] New: LTO: ceph build fails
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 23 Mar '23

23 Mar '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1135030 Bug ID: 1135030 Summary: LTO: ceph build fails Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: martin.liska(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Fails here: https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/openSUSE:Factory:Staging:… due to: [ 8864s] /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/9/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: ../../../lib/librados.so.2.0.0: undefined reference to `rados_aio_create_completion' [ 8864s] /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/9/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: ../../../lib/librados.so.2.0.0: undefined reference to `rados_create_with_context' [ 8864s] /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/9/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: ../../../lib/librados.so.2.0.0: undefined reference to `rados_version' [ 8864s] /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/9/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: ../../../lib/librados.so.2.0.0: undefined reference to `rados_create2' [ 8864s] /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/9/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: ../../../lib/librados.so.2.0.0: undefined reference to `rados_nobjects_list_next' [ 8864s] /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/9/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: ../../../lib/librados.so.2.0.0: undefined reference to `rados_conf_parse_env' [ 8864s] /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/9/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: ../../../lib/librados.so.2.0.0: undefined reference to `rados_conf_set' [ 8864s] /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/9/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: ../../../lib/librados.so.2.0.0: undefined reference to `rados_create' [ 8864s] /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/9/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: ../../../lib/librados.so.2.0.0: undefined reference to `rados_ioctx_create2' [ 8864s] /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/9/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: ../../../lib/librados.so.2.0.0: undefined reference to `rados_conf_parse_argv' [ 8864s] /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/9/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: ../../../lib/librados.so.2.0.0: undefined reference to `rados_conf_read_file' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 8

[Bug 1165294] New: haveged is marked as deleted after reboot
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 22 Mar '23

22 Mar '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1165294 Bug ID: 1165294 Summary: haveged is marked as deleted after reboot Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: hpj(a)urpla.net QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Hi, *After reboot*, a couple of my TW systems show: $ zyp ps Verbosity: 2 Checking for running processes using deleted libraries... The following running processes use deleted files: PID | PPID | UID | User | Command | Service | Files ----+------+-----+------+-------------------+--------- +------------------------------ 531 | 1 | 0 | root | haveged (deleted) | haveged | /lib64/ld-2.31.so | | | | | | /lib64/libc-2.31.so | | | | | | /usr/sbin/haveged (deleted) | | | | | | /usr/lib64/libhavege.so.1.1.0 You may wish to restart these processes. See 'man zypper' for information about the meaning of values in the above table. No core libraries or services have been updated. Reboot is probably not necessary. Marcus Meissner noted on the factory ML, that: > It is ran in the initrd and probably still running after transition to the > regular system. > > (Likely pulled in via dracut-fips module) Shouldn't a transition from initrd to regular operation include a restart of this service then? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 9

[Bug 952198] New: django-admin does not work, django-admin.py does
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 20 Mar '23

20 Mar '23

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952198 Bug ID: 952198 Summary: django-admin does not work, django-admin.py does Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 42.1 RC1 1 Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE 42.1 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Development Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: o.kurz(a)gmx.de QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- observation: The django tutorial https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.8/intro/tutorial01/ suggests to use the tool "django-admin" with django >= v1.7 which is also available in Leap but does not work. "django-admin.py" also exists and works ok. steps to reproduce: - "zypper in python-Django python-sqlite" # confirm uninstallation of blocker package - "django-admin startproject mysite" - observe error with python traceback problem: unknown so far. Is ist maybe related that python-Django (still) uses python2? workaround: - Use django-admin.py which works flawlessly, e.g. example project can be configured and run: "django-admin.py startproject mysite && python manage.py migrate && python manage.py runserver", connect with webbrowser to http://localhost:8000. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 13

[Bug 1129471] New: kernel 5.0.1-1-default: Problem loading X.509 certificate -65
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 20 Mar '23

20 Mar '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1129471 Bug ID: 1129471 Summary: kernel 5.0.1-1-default: Problem loading X.509 certificate -65 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-maintainers(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: hendrikw(a)arcor.de QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Sins Tumbleweed 20190314, with kernel 5.0.1-1-default (x86_64) I get the following message during boot: integrity: Problem loading X.509 certificate -65 Log snippet: [ 2.985576] sched_clock: Marking stable (2989021511, -3468039)->(2994215803, -8662331) [ 2.986009] registered taskstats version 1 [ 2.986012] Loading compiled-in X.509 certificates [ 2.986062] Loaded X.509 cert 'openSUSE Secure Boot Signkey: 0332fa9cbf0d88bf21924b0de82a09a54d5defc8' [ 2.986093] zswap: loaded using pool lzo/zbud [ 2.998908] Key type big_key registered [ 3.005600] Key type encrypted registered [ 3.005606] AppArmor: AppArmor sha1 policy hashing enabled [ 3.008353] integrity: Loading X.509 certificate: UEFI:db [ 3.008414] integrity: Loaded X.509 cert 'Microsoft Windows Production PCA 2011: a92902398e16c49778cd90f99e4f9ae17c55af53' [ 3.008415] integrity: Loading X.509 certificate: UEFI:db [ 3.008452] integrity: Loaded X.509 cert 'Microsoft Corporation UEFI CA 2011: 13adbf4309bd82709c8cd54f316ed522988a1bd4' [ 3.008453] integrity: Loading X.509 certificate: UEFI:db [ 3.008476] integrity: Loaded X.509 cert 'Acer Database: 84f00f5841571abd2cc11a8c26d5c9c8d2b6b0b5' [ 3.008477] integrity: Loading X.509 certificate: UEFI:db [ 3.008482] integrity: Problem loading X.509 certificate -65 [ 3.008494] fbcon: Taking over console [ 3.008496] Error adding keys to platform keyring UEFI:db [ 3.008497] integrity: Loading X.509 certificate: UEFI:db [ 3.008501] integrity: Problem loading X.509 certificate -65 [ 3.008505] Error adding keys to platform keyring UEFI:db [ 3.008596] Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 240x67 [ 3.009680] integrity: Loading X.509 certificate: UEFI:MokListRT [ 3.009739] integrity: Loaded X.509 cert 'openSUSE Secure Boot Signkey: 0332fa9cbf0d88bf21924b0de82a09a54d5defc8' [ 3.009740] integrity: Loading X.509 certificate: UEFI:MokListRT [ 3.012608] integrity: Loaded X.509 cert 'openSUSE Secure Boot CA: 6842600de22c4c477e95be23dfea9513e5971762' [ 3.014923] ima: Allocated hash algorithm: sha256 [ 3.052885] evm: Initialising EVM extended attributes: hardware: Laptop Acer Aspire A517-51-5832, one year old -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 20

[Bug 1153837] New: gobject-introspection has to require a specific Python ABI version
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 20 Mar '23

20 Mar '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1153837 Bug ID: 1153837 Summary: gobject-introspection has to require a specific Python ABI version Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: GNOME Assignee: gnome-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: stefan.bruens(a)rwth-aachen.de QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- The _giscanner module depends on the ABI version used during the build: https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/openSUSE:Factory:Staging:… [ 108s] /usr/lib64/gobject-introspection/giscanner/__init__.py 0 (none) 100644 root root 0 4294967295 [ 108s] -/usr/lib64/gobject-introspection/giscanner/_giscanner.cpython-38-x86_64-linux-gnu.so 0 (none) 100755 root root 0 4294967295 [ 108s] +/usr/lib64/gobject-introspection/giscanner/_giscanner.cpython-37m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so 0 (none) 100755 root root 0 4294967295 [ 108s] /usr/lib64/gobject-introspection/giscanner/_version.py 0 (none) 100644 root root 0 4294967295 Trying to use g-ir-scanner then leads to non-obvious errors, e.g.: https://build.opensuse.org/build/openSUSE:Factory:Staging:C/standard/x86_64… [ 50s] [ 28%] Built target fcitx-addon-fcitx-classic-ui--headers-1 [ 50s] Scanning dependencies of target fcitx-addon-fcitx-x11--addon--conf-1 [ 50s] Traceback (most recent call last): [ 50s] File "/usr/bin/g-ir-scanner", line 98, in <module> [ 50s] from giscanner.scannermain import scanner_main [ 50s] File "/usr/lib64/gobject-introspection/giscanner/scannermain.py", line 35, in <module> [ 50s] from giscanner.ast import Include, Namespace [ 50s] File "/usr/lib64/gobject-introspection/giscanner/ast.py", line 29, in <module> [ 50s] from .sourcescanner import CTYPE_TYPEDEF, CSYMBOL_TYPE_TYPEDEF [ 50s] File "/usr/lib64/gobject-introspection/giscanner/sourcescanner.py", line 33, in <module> [ 50s] from giscanner._giscanner import SourceScanner as CSourceScanner [ 50s] ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'giscanner._giscanner' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 3

[Bug 1140614] New: Error loading Applications menu extension in SLE-Classic
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 20 Mar '23

20 Mar '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1140614 Bug ID: 1140614 Summary: Error loading Applications menu extension in SLE-Classic Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE Factory Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: GNOME Assignee: qkzhu(a)suse.com Reporter: qkzhu(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de CC: gwang(a)suse.com, xiaoguang.wang(a)suse.com, yfjiang(a)suse.com, zcjia(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- apps-menu disappeared in TW-20190704, and journalctl shows: > gnome-shell[2369]: Extension "apps-menu(a)gnome-shell-extensions.gcampax.github.com" had error: Error: Requiring GMenu, version none: Typelib file for namespace 'GMenu' (any version) not found -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 15

[Bug 1146018] New: Unreliable copy and cut
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 19 Mar '23

19 Mar '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1146018 Bug ID: 1146018 Summary: Unreliable copy and cut Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: KDE Workspace (Plasma) Assignee: opensuse-kde-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: audi_s4(a)luukku.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- After fresh installation of Tumbleweed to a new hardware (Ryzen Threadripper + AMD gfx) copy and cut with ctrl+c/x started working unreliably (never experienced this with the previous hardware setups). After KDE is started these work OK but after few hours already copy and cut start to miss these presses. 2nd press usually works but not always. After several days without restarting KDE this problem gets more severe - misses more often. Also, strange behaviour happens with Dolphin for example. When ctrl+x is pressed the file/folder icon flicks quickly to greyed out (cut selection) and back to normal. It becomes difficult to press ctrl+x so that cut selection remains. Holding ctrl+x pressed for repeat the icon start to flicker between normal and selected. Tried changing clipboard configuration options but none have made any difference to the problem. I have not seen issues with paste i.e. if there's something on a clipboard it can be pasted. This is not only ctrl+c/x button combination issue but same applied to selecting copy&cut from application menus. All applications (KDE basic apps, LibreOffice, Thunderbird, Firefox..) I use suffer from this problem thus it seems to be KDE related issue. This has been an issue for several months (since installation early 2019). In the beginning it was even worse i.e. some updates have reduced the issue a bit but not much. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 4

[Bug 1100677] New: trackerbug: packages do not build reproducibly from compile-time CPU-detection
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 17 Mar '23

17 Mar '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1100677 Bug ID: 1100677 Summary: trackerbug: packages do not build reproducibly from compile-time CPU-detection Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: openSUSE Factory Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Development Assignee: bwiedemann(a)suse.com Reporter: bwiedemann(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Depends on: 1100520 Blocks: 1081754 Found By: Development Blocker: --- e.g. bug 1100520 compiler options -march=native and -mtune=native make the resulting machine code depend on the build system's CPU which breaks reproducible builds. affects at least: glucat form python-annoy legion trigger-rally This is already fixed in: clpeak higan kyotocabinet one common approach seems to do sed -i "s|-march=native||g" $FILE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 19