November 2020 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-bugs] [Bug 1178053] Missing python binding for i2c-tools
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Nov '20

12 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178053 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178053#c8 --- Comment #8 from Jean Delvare <jdelvare(a)suse.com> --- My maintenance request for SLE 15 has been accepted. Now, how do we get the new python binding package into Leap 15.2? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[opensuse-bugs] [Bug 1156725] Unable to run zypper dup: python3-salt-2019.2.0-14.1.x86_64 conflicts with python3-tornado >= 5 provided by python3-tornado-6.0-12.1.noarch
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Nov '20

12 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156725 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156725#c1 Jochen Breuer <jbreuer(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jbreuer(a)suse.com, | |rombert(a)apache.org Flags| |needinfo?(rombert(a)apache.or | |g) --- Comment #1 from Jochen Breuer <jbreuer(a)suse.com> --- Robert, are you still seeing this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[opensuse-bugs] [Bug 1178703] VUL-0: CVE-2020-16013,CVE-2020-16017: chromium: multiple security issues fixed in 86.0.4240.198
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Nov '20

12 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178703 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178703#c2 --- Comment #2 from OBSbugzilla Bot <bwiedemann+obsbugzillabot(a)suse.com> --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (1178703) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/848027 Factory / chromium https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/848028 15.1+15.2+Backports:SLE-15-SP1+Backports:SLE-15-SP2 / chromium -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[opensuse-bugs] [Bug 1139024] At boot : Failed to start Volatile Files and Directories
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Nov '20

12 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1139024 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1139024#c13 Pablo Su�rez Hern�ndez <pablo.suarezhernandez(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P5 - None |P3 - Medium Status|NEW |CONFIRMED Assignee|pablo.suarezhernandez@suse. |salt-maintainers(a)suse.de |com | Severity|Major |Minor --- Comment #13 from Pablo Su�rez Hern�ndez <pablo.suarezhernandez(a)suse.com> --- Sorry this one gets overlooked. I'm resetting the priority and assignee for the remaining issue about warning messages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[opensuse-bugs] [Bug 1178360] X11 Pixel Garbage in VirtualBox
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Nov '20

12 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178360 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178360#c36 --- Comment #36 from Stefan Hundhammer <shundhammer(a)suse.com> --- I don't know what's going on there. But I do know that the problem started with the latest kernel 5.9.1, and it's the same with VirtualBox 6.1.10 using the VBoxVGA graphics driver there. When I look at that pixel garbage (see screenshot), I can see remnants of the framebuffer console with kernel and systemd messages with green [success] messages. The pixel lines are of course not aligned to make a proper image (different resolution), but it looks very much like what used to be the framebuffer during the boot process. At the same time, the X11 screen content appears to be offset downwards and to the right (which probably explains why keyboard echo does not appear where it should). So, knowing nothing about how the kernel, the framebuffer or the graphics drivers work, it appears to me as if the start pointer of the graphics pixel buffer is offset in that scenario. From previous ventures into low-level graphics stuff back in the early 90s that reminds me of base parameters of how the graphics are set up are wrong; back then it was bit order vs. byte order, pixel line padding and similar things. Maybe that newer kernel departed from previous such settings that were always taken for granted (and thus coded into that VBoxVGA driver on the VirtualBox side). But that is pure speculation, of course. My point is when I have that problem, others will have it as well; this may very well be a ticking time bomb. I personally can live for a while (weeks or months) with simply not updating that kernel, and when I have to (which sooner or later will happen), try my luck with another virtualization solution like libvirt or VmWare. Paying SLE customers may see that differently, though, and insist on a solution (with filing L3 support calls). I don't know how far L3 support for VirtualBox in SLE goes, but customers may argue that it's a SUSE problem, not their VirtualBox host. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[opensuse-bugs] [Bug 1178296] /usr/etc/skel handling completely broken
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Nov '20

12 Nov '20

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1178296 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1178296#c34 --- Comment #34 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Thorsten Kukuk from comment #33) > /etc/skel has to win over /usr/etc/skel, else an admin could never adjust > the default files. OK ... this does my patch AFAICS ... compare bin directory and the file .foobar of /etc/skel and /usr/etc/skel/ noether:/ # find /etc/skel/ /usr/etc/skel/ -ls 607239120 0 drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 93 Nov 12 09:35 /etc/skel/ 607239149 0 -rw------- 1 root root 0 May 18 1996 /etc/skel/.bash_history 607239127 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 604 Oct 28 15:56 /etc/skel/.bashrc 607239128 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 856 Oct 28 15:56 /etc/skel/.profile 294005887 0 drwx------ 2 root root 18 Nov 11 13:57 /etc/skel/bin 308500553 0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 Nov 11 13:57 /etc/skel/bin/testx 844506982 0 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 24 Nov 11 13:58 /etc/skel/.config 932688 0 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 6 Nov 11 13:58 /etc/skel/.config/application 607239142 0 -rw------- 1 root root 0 Nov 12 09:35 /etc/skel/.foobar 537521994 0 drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 70 Nov 12 09:35 /usr/etc/skel/ 808252399 0 drwx------ 2 root root 6 Oct 27 15:16 /usr/etc/skel/.config 207420 0 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 6 Oct 27 15:16 /usr/etc/skel/.fonts 269600589 0 drwx------ 2 root root 6 Oct 27 15:16 /usr/etc/skel/.local 537521997 0 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 6 Oct 27 15:16 /usr/etc/skel/bin 594299232 0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Nov 12 09:35 /usr/etc/skel/.foobar and it seems that /etc/skel wins here noether:/ # find /home/foobar/ -ls 594299238 0 drwxr-xr-x 6 foobar users 119 Nov 12 09:36 /home/foobar/ 970282031 0 drwxr-xr-x 3 foobar users 24 Nov 11 13:58 /home/foobar/.config 970283715 0 drwxr-xr-x 2 foobar users 6 Nov 11 13:58 /home/foobar/.config/application 493155 0 drwxr-xr-x 2 foobar users 6 Oct 27 15:16 /home/foobar/.fonts 308500554 0 drwx------ 2 foobar users 6 Oct 27 15:16 /home/foobar/.local 594299239 0 drwx------ 2 foobar users 18 Nov 11 13:57 /home/foobar/bin 594299245 0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 foobar users 0 Nov 11 13:57 /home/foobar/bin/testx 594299240 0 -rw------- 1 foobar users 0 Nov 12 09:35 /home/foobar/.foobar 594299241 0 -rw------- 1 foobar users 0 May 18 1996 /home/foobar/.bash_history 594299242 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 foobar users 604 Oct 28 15:56 /home/foobar/.bashrc 594299243 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 foobar users 856 Oct 28 15:56 /home/foobar/.profile -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[opensuse-bugs] [Bug 1120817] stacktrace on compound command execution
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Nov '20

12 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120817 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120817#c4 Jochen Breuer <jbreuer(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED CC| |jbreuer(a)suse.com Resolution|--- |UPSTREAM --- Comment #4 from Jochen Breuer <jbreuer(a)suse.com> --- Closing the issue with resolved/upstream again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[opensuse-bugs] [Bug 1177525] kbfs fails in %check on aarch64
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Nov '20

12 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177525 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177525#c3 --- Comment #3 from Guillaume GARDET <guillaume.gardet(a)arm.com> --- The job history from security/kbfs, suggests it passes on obs-arm-1 but fails on obs-arm-{8,9}. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[opensuse-bugs] [Bug 1178656] azure-cli reports 'SubscriptionClient' object has no attribute 'config'
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Nov '20

12 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178656 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178656#c3 --- Comment #3 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <adrian.glaubitz(a)suse.com> --- Hmm, it looks like this is a regression in azure-cli that occurs when the python-azure-mgmt-resource package gets updated to version 15.x and it seems upstream has not resolved this issue yet. See: https://github.com/Azure/azure-cli/issues/15530 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[opensuse-bugs] [Bug 1178656] azure-cli reports 'SubscriptionClient' object has no attribute 'config'
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Nov '20

12 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178656 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178656#c2 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <adrian.glaubitz(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CONFIRMED --- Comment #2 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <adrian.glaubitz(a)suse.com> --- I was not able to login with -u, -p and -t provided but just using "az login" with authentication through the browser worked and I could reproduce the problem. Looking into it now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0