October 2015 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 930496] gcc5 missing force_inline fix
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Oct '15

07 Oct '15

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=930496 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=930496#c3 Richard Biener <rguenther(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenther(a)suse.com> --- Fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 945909] ldconfig core dumps
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Oct '15

07 Oct '15

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=945909 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=945909#c6 Michal Marek <mmarek(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #6 from Michal Marek <mmarek(a)suse.com> --- According to the strace output, inode numbers returned by getdents() and lstat() match in /usr/lib64/, but there could be a mismatch elsewhere. do you still see the failure? If so, does it go away after runnig fsck.xfs? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 908780 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 908780] getdents breakage on symlink causes ldconfig core dump
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Oct '15

07 Oct '15

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908780 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908780#c35 Michal Marek <mmarek(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rjschwei(a)suse.com --- Comment #35 from Michal Marek <mmarek(a)suse.com> --- *** Bug 945909 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 949211] undefined symbol json_tokener_errors in libjson-c2 breaks rsyslog compatability in Leap
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Oct '15

07 Oct '15

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949211 Paul Gonin <pgonin(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pgonin(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 947734] (EE) systemd-logind disappeared (stopped/restarted?) (WAS: GNOME does not start)
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Oct '15

07 Oct '15

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=947734 Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar(a)opensuse.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bnc-team-screening(a)forge.pr |systemd-maintainers(a)suse.de |ovo.novell.com | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 949211] undefined symbol json_tokener_errors in libjson-c2 breaks rsyslog compatability in Leap
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Oct '15

07 Oct '15

1 0

[Bug 947734] (EE) systemd-logind disappeared (stopped/restarted?) (WAS: GNOME does not start)
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Oct '15

07 Oct '15

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=947734 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=947734#c7 --- Comment #7 from Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar(a)opensuse.org> --- Howard, Can you please test the systemd package provided by Werner in bug 946556 ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 573488] Installation adds 127.0.0.2 to /etc/hosts which breaks a lot of network software
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Oct '15

07 Oct '15

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573488 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573488#c3 fons jongh <fdjongh(a)novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED CC| |bschoofs(a)novell.com, | |fdjongh(a)novell.com Resolution|FEATURE |--- --- Comment #3 from fons jongh <fdjongh(a)novell.com> --- Hi Katarina, Can you fix this bug for all maintained SuSE Linux platforms, please? If any particular software requires the entry to be in /etc/hosts to resolve the host name into a loopback address, then that software should be fixed. Software should be able to verify if the host name or DNS name resolves into a local address and in such case connect to the loopback address instead the resolved local address in case that is required. Not all services listen at 0.0.0.0 (all IP addresses) or at loopback addresses. Suppose the host name is "myhost" and the host IP address is 192.168.0.1. You have a service listening at socket 192.168.0.1:8030 /etc/hosts contains the following entries: # good: 192.168.0.1 myhost.local myhost # bad: 127.0.0.2 myhost.local myhost When you want to connect to the local service by host name, the configuration in /etc/hosts causes the host name to resolve into either 192.168.0.1 or in 127.0.0.2. Because nothing listens at 127.0.0.2:8030, TCP returns a RST upon receipt of SYN segments to connect to destination 127.0.0.2:8030 and the client will fail to connect. Another problem is that if you configure a service to listen at a particular socket with the host name instead of IP address, then the incorrect entry in /etc/hosts can cause the service to listen at 127.0.0.2 instead of the host IP address and clients at remote hosts will not be able to connect. Of course, we can resolve the problem by removing the entry manually, but this incorrect configuration causes trouble and it should not be in /etc/hosts. Thank you very much for your help and kind regards, Fons -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 914656] seccheck in security repo won't run
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Oct '15

07 Oct '15

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914656 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914656#c4 --- Comment #4 from Victor Pereira <vpereira(a)novell.com> --- The submission is https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/336907 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 934544] New: seccheck: bash function missing () in the declaration
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Oct '15

07 Oct '15

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=934544 Bug ID: 934544 Summary: seccheck: bash function missing () in the declaration Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: 13.2 Hardware: Other OS: openSUSE 13.2 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Security Assignee: security-team(a)suse.de Reporter: vpereira(a)novell.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Hi, I'm receiving errors after the last seccheck update: /usr/lib/secchk/helper.inc: line 46: guessable_password_email: command not found sed: can't read blurbs/guessable_passwd.txt: No such file or directory /usr/lib/secchk/helper.inc: line 49: syntax error near unexpected token `}' /usr/lib/secchk/helper.inc: line 49: `}' /usr/lib/secchk/helper.inc: line 46: guessable_password_email: command not found sed: can't read blurbs/guessable_passwd.txt: No such file or directory /usr/lib/secchk/helper.inc: line 49: syntax error near unexpected token `}' /usr/lib/secchk/helper.inc: line 49: `}' /usr/lib/secchk/security-daily.sh: line 64: check_for_globally_exported_fs: command not found /usr/lib/secchk/security-daily.sh: line 70: list_loaded_kernel_modules: command not found /usr/lib/secchk/security-daily.sh: line 73: nfs_mounted_with_missing_nosuid: command not found /usr/lib/secchk/security-daily.sh: line 76: display_programs_with_bound_sockets: command not found /usr/lib/secchk/security-control.sh: line 52: send_daily_changes: command not found Is anybody aware of this? Thanks! Markus -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4