hi, On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Uwe Gansert wrote:

On Monday 09 February 2009 18:15:12 PGNet wrote: SUSE Linux version? I tried SLES10 SP2 and powersaved is disbaled with your config.

i'm running opensuse 11.1/x86_64 for both Dom0 & DomU. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-autoinstall+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-autoinstall+help@opensuse.org

hi, On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:25 AM, Uwe Gansert wrote:

I don't know about powersaved because I dont have that on my 11.1

i don't want it on my system. and hence am trying to disable it. but, this 'fail' interrupts the autoyast install :-/

but actually it should work the way you configured it. This has been reported to work on 11.1 for example:

<runlevel> (snip)

in similar fashion, i have ... <runlevel> <default>3</default> <services config:type="list"> <service> cups disable </service> <service> powersaved disable </service> <service> splash disable </service> <service> splash_early disable </service> </services> </runlevel> ... with that config, here's an image of the fail @ install, http://tinyurl.com/d5neg5 i understand it's _supposed_ to work. my issue is that, unfortunately, it doesn't seem to. something's missing or misconfigured ... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-autoinstall+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-autoinstall+help@opensuse.org

hi, On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:57 AM, Uwe Gansert wrote:

where do you get it? It's not on my 11.1 installation source at all?

that was the right question for me to finally 'get it'. powersaved was a 'problematic' (to me ...) package that _had_ been available in 11.0, http://packages.opensuse-community.org/index.jsp?distro=openSUSE_110&searchTerm=powersave and, as you've correctly pointed out, is _not_ in 11.1. this autoyast config was migrated from 11.0 -> 11.1, and i did not remove the reference to powersaved, wanting to ensure it was disabled ... but, not realizing that it had 'gone away'. what i failed to realize is that autoyast installation would 'fail' (or interrupt, as described here) if a stanza was included to disable a service that did not exist. for 11.1, removing that stanza, the error goes away. which raises a question -- i agree that a service EN-able should fail/interrupt if autoyast is faced with a missing service, but should a DIS-able also fail if the service doesn't exist? or, rather, simply pass-thru with no error/no action? personally, i lean towards the former ... but, the latter might make sense. thanks! -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-autoinstall+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-autoinstall+help@opensuse.org