Re: [opensuse-arm] Leap 42.2 plans?
Ludwig Nussel - 14:16 9.03.16 wrote:
Hi,
Are there any plans to build the next Leap (42.2) also on ARM architectures?
It would be nice to try this time to get even armv7 version as most of the boards out there are armv7. I'm willing to dedicate it some time, but it would be definitely for ports. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
19.03.2016 12:32, Michal Hrusecky пишет:
Ludwig Nussel - 14:16 9.03.16 wrote:
Hi,
Are there any plans to build the next Leap (42.2) also on ARM architectures?
It would be nice to try this time to get even armv7 version as most of the boards out there are armv7. I'm willing to dedicate it some time, but it would be definitely for ports.
Last thing I heart that build service is lacking armv7 build power and this is a reason that there is no Leap 42.1 for armv7. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
Matwey V. Kornilov - 23:25 21.03.16 wrote:
19.03.2016 12:32, Michal Hrusecky пишет:
Ludwig Nussel - 14:16 9.03.16 wrote:
Hi,
Are there any plans to build the next Leap (42.2) also on ARM architectures?
It would be nice to try this time to get even armv7 version as most of the boards out there are armv7. I'm willing to dedicate it some time, but it would be definitely for ports.
Last thing I heart that build service is lacking armv7 build power and this is a reason that there is no Leap 42.1 for armv7.
That was only part of the problem. Some of the resources were restored and it lacked dedicated person - someone who would receive all the bugs/blame. Apart from that, Leap is LTS so it shouldn't be moving that much as Tumbleweed, so it shouldn't consume that much of the resources. Other argument was that Leap doesn't support 32-bits and some packages might be broken, but currently quite some of the packages are not broken. If I aim to get just a big portion of Leap compiled while accepting that some packages might be missing in the end, I think it should be pretty doable. And I can probably fix few packages to get closer to the full Leap. I would start ring by ring and we will see. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
22.03.2016 15:59, Michal Hrusecky пишет:
Matwey V. Kornilov - 23:25 21.03.16 wrote:
19.03.2016 12:32, Michal Hrusecky пишет:
Ludwig Nussel - 14:16 9.03.16 wrote:
Hi,
Are there any plans to build the next Leap (42.2) also on ARM architectures?
It would be nice to try this time to get even armv7 version as most of the boards out there are armv7. I'm willing to dedicate it some time, but it would be definitely for ports.
Last thing I heart that build service is lacking armv7 build power and this is a reason that there is no Leap 42.1 for armv7.
That was only part of the problem. Some of the resources were restored and it lacked dedicated person - someone who would receive all the bugs/blame. Apart from that, Leap is LTS so it shouldn't be moving that much as Tumbleweed, so it shouldn't consume that much of the resources. Other argument was that Leap doesn't support 32-bits and some packages might be broken, but currently quite some of the packages are not broken. If I aim to get just a big portion of Leap compiled while accepting that some packages might be missing in the end, I think it should be pretty doable. And I can probably fix few packages to get closer to the full Leap. I would start ring by ring and we will see.
Great, I could test and patch Leap kernel for BeagleBone Black, but unfortunately it seems to be the single task where I can help with Leap. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
participants (2)
-
Matwey V. Kornilov -
Michal Hrusecky