Re: [opensuse-arm] ARM status
On Sun, November 27, 2011 8:35 pm, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 27.11.2011, at 20:17, Tomas Cech wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 04:53:36PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
Hi guys,
It's time for a small status update. This won't be an extensive list,
*** We can successfully build ~3500 out of ~4700 Factory packages! ***
I'm still not able to find, where is the right project with armv7l failing packages, could somebody send link?
This one https://build.opensuse.org/project/monitor?commit=Filter%3A&failed=1&pkgname=&repo_armv5el=1&repo_armv7hl=1&repo_images=1&arch_armv5el=1&arch_armv7hl=1&arch_local=1&project=openSUSE%3AFactory%3AARM&defaults=0 (which can be found on http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:ARM) doesn't show any armv7l packages...
Ah, sorry, I fixed the link on the wiki now :). Basically your portal to any interesting information is at
https://build.opensuse.org/project/show?project=openSUSE:Factory:ARM
Unfortunately Factory is updating so fast that we just haven't managed
to do a full build of all these shina packages for the last 3 weeks, so packages you see in the download repository are from 3 weeks ago. To fetch the newer builds, just run "osc getbinaries ...". Beware of dragons though :).
If it is worth of effort, I can set up that new Efika MX as OBS worker
(if someone help me - prusnak or miska probably already have
experience with this). I would just disable it when I'm trying to fix or test something.
Yes, please :). Adrian probably has a pretty clear idea on what's required to get this rolling.
So what is still missing from here? Well, these are the pieces I'm
but at least give you an overview of what has happened since the last time :). tracking right now:
* Kiwi support (Marcus is on it!) * Kernel testing and making-it-work [1]
I think/hope that I can help a bit here.
I got the pandaboard kernel reasonably well working now, so if you could tackle the i.MX51 one, I would very much appreciate it :).
* Exception handling [1] keeps us from building Java, keeps us from
building most of the other 1200 packages
* hwinfo probably needs some love for ARM * yast2 could use some love as well :) * X drivers are probably still missing * Fixing broken packages, there are still a few that are not broken because of exception handling :) And with this hopefully too.
There are a couple of generic broken ones thanks to the recent ncurses changes in factory. I'm still puzzled why bash doesn't compile anymore for example - it's definitely related to the curses change.
I assume this is the problem, see buildlog ( https://build.opensuse.org/package/rawlog?arch=armv7l&package=bash&project=openSUSE%3AFactory%3AARM&repository=standard and https://build.opensuse.org/package/rawlog?arch=armv5el&package=bash&project=openSUSE%3AFactory%3AARM&repository=armv5el) : <armv5el> checking whether gcc -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/bash-4.2 -L/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/bash-4.2/../readline-6.2 needs -traditional... no checking for tgetent... no checking for tgetent in -ltermcap... no checking for tgetent in -ltinfo... no checking for tgetent in -lcurses... no checking for tgetent in -lncurses... yes checking which library has the termcap functions... using libncurses </armv5el> <armv7l> checking whether gcc -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/bash-4.2 -L/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/bash-4.2/../readline-6.2 needs -traditional... no checking for tgetent... no checking for tgetent in -ltermcap... yes checking which library has the termcap functions... using libtermcap </armv7l>
Then there are a number of packages that complain in thumb mode "swp"
instructions. However, swp is not guaranteed by the armv7 architecture anymore, so if there's old thumb code somewhere which gets triggered by our build, you see those swp errors. The easy fix is to just disable thumb for that package. Just check texlive-bin on how that works :).
Alex
Regards, Joop. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
On 28.11.2011, at 01:09, Joop Boonen wrote:
On Sun, November 27, 2011 8:35 pm, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 27.11.2011, at 20:17, Tomas Cech wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 04:53:36PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
Hi guys,
It's time for a small status update. This won't be an extensive list,
*** We can successfully build ~3500 out of ~4700 Factory packages! ***
I'm still not able to find, where is the right project with armv7l failing packages, could somebody send link?
This one https://build.opensuse.org/project/monitor?commit=Filter%3A&failed=1&pkgname=&repo_armv5el=1&repo_armv7hl=1&repo_images=1&arch_armv5el=1&arch_armv7hl=1&arch_local=1&project=openSUSE%3AFactory%3AARM&defaults=0 (which can be found on http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:ARM) doesn't show any armv7l packages...
Ah, sorry, I fixed the link on the wiki now :). Basically your portal to any interesting information is at
https://build.opensuse.org/project/show?project=openSUSE:Factory:ARM
Unfortunately Factory is updating so fast that we just haven't managed
to do a full build of all these shina packages for the last 3 weeks, so packages you see in the download repository are from 3 weeks ago. To fetch the newer builds, just run "osc getbinaries ...". Beware of dragons though :).
If it is worth of effort, I can set up that new Efika MX as OBS worker
(if someone help me - prusnak or miska probably already have
experience with this). I would just disable it when I'm trying to fix or test something.
Yes, please :). Adrian probably has a pretty clear idea on what's required to get this rolling.
So what is still missing from here? Well, these are the pieces I'm
but at least give you an overview of what has happened since the last time :). tracking right now:
* Kiwi support (Marcus is on it!) * Kernel testing and making-it-work [1]
I think/hope that I can help a bit here.
I got the pandaboard kernel reasonably well working now, so if you could tackle the i.MX51 one, I would very much appreciate it :).
* Exception handling [1] keeps us from building Java, keeps us from
building most of the other 1200 packages
* hwinfo probably needs some love for ARM * yast2 could use some love as well :) * X drivers are probably still missing * Fixing broken packages, there are still a few that are not broken because of exception handling :) And with this hopefully too.
There are a couple of generic broken ones thanks to the recent ncurses changes in factory. I'm still puzzled why bash doesn't compile anymore for example - it's definitely related to the curses change.
I assume this is the problem, see buildlog ( https://build.opensuse.org/package/rawlog?arch=armv7l&package=bash&project=openSUSE%3AFactory%3AARM&repository=standard and https://build.opensuse.org/package/rawlog?arch=armv5el&package=bash&project=openSUSE%3AFactory%3AARM&repository=armv5el) :
<armv5el> checking whether gcc -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/bash-4.2 -L/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/bash-4.2/../readline-6.2 needs -traditional... no checking for tgetent... no checking for tgetent in -ltermcap... no checking for tgetent in -ltinfo... no checking for tgetent in -lcurses... no checking for tgetent in -lncurses... yes checking which library has the termcap functions... using libncurses </armv5el>
<armv7l> checking whether gcc -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/bash-4.2 -L/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/bash-4.2/../readline-6.2 needs -traditional... no checking for tgetent... no checking for tgetent in -ltermcap... yes checking which library has the termcap functions... using libtermcap </armv7l>
So how about x86_64? That's the one we should really compare to as it's what works atm :) Alex -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
On Mon, November 28, 2011 10:12 am, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 28.11.2011, at 01:09, Joop Boonen wrote:
On Sun, November 27, 2011 8:35 pm, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 27.11.2011, at 20:17, Tomas Cech wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 04:53:36PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
Hi guys,
It's time for a small status update. This won't be an extensive list,
*** We can successfully build ~3500 out of ~4700 Factory packages! ***
I'm still not able to find, where is the right project with armv7l failing packages, could somebody send link?
This one https://build.opensuse.org/project/monitor?commit=Filter%3A&failed=1&pkgname=&repo_armv5el=1&repo_armv7hl=1&repo_images=1&arch_armv5el=1&arch_armv7hl=1&arch_local=1&project=openSUSE%3AFactory%3AARM&defaults=0 (which can be found on http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:ARM) doesn't show any armv7l packages...
Ah, sorry, I fixed the link on the wiki now :). Basically your portal to any interesting information is at
https://build.opensuse.org/project/show?project=openSUSE:Factory:ARM
Unfortunately Factory is updating so fast that we just haven't managed
to do a full build of all these shina packages for the last 3 weeks, so packages you see in the download repository are from 3 weeks ago. To fetch the newer builds, just run "osc getbinaries ...". Beware of dragons though :).
If it is worth of effort, I can set up that new Efika MX as OBS worker
(if someone help me - prusnak or miska probably already have
experience with this). I would just disable it when I'm trying to fix or test something.
Yes, please :). Adrian probably has a pretty clear idea on what's required to get this rolling.
So what is still missing from here? Well, these are the pieces I'm
but at least give you an overview of what has happened since the last time :). tracking right now:
* Kiwi support (Marcus is on it!) * Kernel testing and making-it-work [1]
I think/hope that I can help a bit here.
I got the pandaboard kernel reasonably well working now, so if you could tackle the i.MX51 one, I would very much appreciate it :).
* Exception handling [1] keeps us from building Java, keeps us from
building most of the other 1200 packages
* hwinfo probably needs some love for ARM * yast2 could use some love as well :) * X drivers are probably still missing * Fixing broken packages, there are still a few that are not broken because of exception handling :) And with this hopefully too.
There are a couple of generic broken ones thanks to the recent ncurses changes in factory. I'm still puzzled why bash doesn't compile anymore for example - it's definitely related to the curses change.
I assume this is the problem, see buildlog ( https://build.opensuse.org/package/rawlog?arch=armv7l&package=bash&project=openSUSE%3AFactory%3AARM&repository=standard and https://build.opensuse.org/package/rawlog?arch=armv5el&package=bash&project=openSUSE%3AFactory%3AARM&repository=armv5el) :
<armv5el> checking whether gcc -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/bash-4.2 -L/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/bash-4.2/../readline-6.2 needs -traditional... no checking for tgetent... no checking for tgetent in -ltermcap... no checking for tgetent in -ltinfo... no checking for tgetent in -lcurses... no checking for tgetent in -lncurses... yes checking which library has the termcap functions... using libncurses </armv5el>
<armv7l> checking whether gcc -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/bash-4.2 -L/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/bash-4.2/../readline-6.2 needs -traditional... no checking for tgetent... no checking for tgetent in -ltermcap... yes checking which library has the termcap functions... using libtermcap </armv7l>
So how about x86_64? That's the one we should really compare to as it's what works atm :)
I've just checked this (for x86_64). For openSUSE:Factory it fails, with the same error. https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=bash&project=openSUSE%3AFactory While for Base:System it's fine. https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=bash&project=Base%3ASystem So it looks like it has been fixed. But it needs to be submitted / approved in openSUSE:Factory.
Alex
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
Regards, Joop. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
On Mon, November 28, 2011 5:02 pm, Joop Boonen wrote:
On Mon, November 28, 2011 10:12 am, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 28.11.2011, at 01:09, Joop Boonen wrote:
On Sun, November 27, 2011 8:35 pm, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 27.11.2011, at 20:17, Tomas Cech wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 04:53:36PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
Hi guys,
It's time for a small status update. This won't be an extensive list,
*** We can successfully build ~3500 out of ~4700 Factory packages! ***
I'm still not able to find, where is the right project with armv7l failing packages, could somebody send link?
This one https://build.opensuse.org/project/monitor?commit=Filter%3A&failed=1&pkgname=&repo_armv5el=1&repo_armv7hl=1&repo_images=1&arch_armv5el=1&arch_armv7hl=1&arch_local=1&project=openSUSE%3AFactory%3AARM&defaults=0 (which can be found on http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:ARM) doesn't show any armv7l packages...
Ah, sorry, I fixed the link on the wiki now :). Basically your portal to any interesting information is at
https://build.opensuse.org/project/show?project=openSUSE:Factory:ARM
Unfortunately Factory is updating so fast that we just haven't managed
to do a full build of all these shina packages for the last 3 weeks, so packages you see in the download repository are from 3 weeks ago. To fetch the newer builds, just run "osc getbinaries ...". Beware of dragons though :).
If it is worth of effort, I can set up that new Efika MX as OBS worker
(if someone help me - prusnak or miska probably already have
experience with this). I would just disable it when I'm trying to fix or test something.
Yes, please :). Adrian probably has a pretty clear idea on what's required to get this rolling.
So what is still missing from here? Well, these are the pieces I'm
but at least give you an overview of what has happened since the last time :). tracking right now:
* Kiwi support (Marcus is on it!) * Kernel testing and making-it-work [1]
I think/hope that I can help a bit here.
I got the pandaboard kernel reasonably well working now, so if you could tackle the i.MX51 one, I would very much appreciate it :).
* Exception handling [1] keeps us from building Java, keeps us from
building most of the other 1200 packages
* hwinfo probably needs some love for ARM * yast2 could use some love as well :) * X drivers are probably still missing * Fixing broken packages, there are still a few that are not broken because of exception handling :) And with this hopefully too.
There are a couple of generic broken ones thanks to the recent ncurses changes in factory. I'm still puzzled why bash doesn't compile anymore for example - it's definitely related to the curses change.
I assume this is the problem, see buildlog ( https://build.opensuse.org/package/rawlog?arch=armv7l&package=bash&project=openSUSE%3AFactory%3AARM&repository=standard and https://build.opensuse.org/package/rawlog?arch=armv5el&package=bash&project=openSUSE%3AFactory%3AARM&repository=armv5el) :
<armv5el> checking whether gcc -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/bash-4.2 -L/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/bash-4.2/../readline-6.2 needs -traditional... no checking for tgetent... no checking for tgetent in -ltermcap... no checking for tgetent in -ltinfo... no checking for tgetent in -lcurses... no checking for tgetent in -lncurses... yes checking which library has the termcap functions... using libncurses </armv5el>
<armv7l> checking whether gcc -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/bash-4.2 -L/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/bash-4.2/../readline-6.2 needs -traditional... no checking for tgetent... no checking for tgetent in -ltermcap... yes checking which library has the termcap functions... using libtermcap </armv7l>
So how about x86_64? That's the one we should really compare to as it's what works atm :)
I've just checked this (for x86_64). For openSUSE:Factory it fails, with the same error. https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=bash&project=openSUSE%3AFactory While for Base:System it's fine. https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=bash&project=Base%3ASystem
So it looks like it has been fixed. But it needs to be submitted / approved in openSUSE:Factory.
I found out that the cause is the ncurses package. The latest version hasn't been committed to openSUSE:Factory. I've just sent submit request: 94346
Alex
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
Regards, Joop. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
On 29.11.2011, at 19:23, Joop Boonen wrote:
On Mon, November 28, 2011 5:02 pm, Joop Boonen wrote:
On Mon, November 28, 2011 10:12 am, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 28.11.2011, at 01:09, Joop Boonen wrote:
On Sun, November 27, 2011 8:35 pm, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 27.11.2011, at 20:17, Tomas Cech wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 04:53:36PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > Hi guys, > > It's time for a small status update. This won't be an extensive > list,
> > *** We can successfully build ~3500 out of ~4700 Factory packages! > *** >
I'm still not able to find, where is the right project with armv7l failing packages, could somebody send link?
This one https://build.opensuse.org/project/monitor?commit=Filter%3A&failed=1&pkgname=&repo_armv5el=1&repo_armv7hl=1&repo_images=1&arch_armv5el=1&arch_armv7hl=1&arch_local=1&project=openSUSE%3AFactory%3AARM&defaults=0 (which can be found on http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:ARM) doesn't show any armv7l packages...
Ah, sorry, I fixed the link on the wiki now :). Basically your portal to any interesting information is at
https://build.opensuse.org/project/show?project=openSUSE:Factory:ARM
> Unfortunately Factory is updating so fast that we just haven't > managed
to do a full build of all these shina packages for the last 3 weeks, so packages you see in the download repository are from 3 weeks ago. To fetch the newer builds, just run "osc getbinaries ...". Beware of dragons though :).
If it is worth of effort, I can set up that new Efika MX as OBS worker
(if someone help me - prusnak or miska probably already have
experience with this). I would just disable it when I'm trying to fix or test something.
Yes, please :). Adrian probably has a pretty clear idea on what's required to get this rolling.
> So what is still missing from here? Well, these are the pieces I'm
but at least give you an overview of what has happened since the last time :). tracking right now:
> > * Kiwi support (Marcus is on it!) > * Kernel testing and making-it-work [1]
I think/hope that I can help a bit here.
I got the pandaboard kernel reasonably well working now, so if you could tackle the i.MX51 one, I would very much appreciate it :).
> * Exception handling [1] keeps us from building Java, keeps us from
building most of the other 1200 packages
> * hwinfo probably needs some love for ARM > * yast2 could use some love as well :) > * X drivers are probably still missing > * Fixing broken packages, there are still a few that are not broken because of exception handling :) And with this hopefully too.
There are a couple of generic broken ones thanks to the recent ncurses changes in factory. I'm still puzzled why bash doesn't compile anymore for example - it's definitely related to the curses change.
I assume this is the problem, see buildlog ( https://build.opensuse.org/package/rawlog?arch=armv7l&package=bash&project=openSUSE%3AFactory%3AARM&repository=standard and https://build.opensuse.org/package/rawlog?arch=armv5el&package=bash&project=openSUSE%3AFactory%3AARM&repository=armv5el) :
<armv5el> checking whether gcc -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/bash-4.2 -L/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/bash-4.2/../readline-6.2 needs -traditional... no checking for tgetent... no checking for tgetent in -ltermcap... no checking for tgetent in -ltinfo... no checking for tgetent in -lcurses... no checking for tgetent in -lncurses... yes checking which library has the termcap functions... using libncurses </armv5el>
<armv7l> checking whether gcc -I/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/bash-4.2 -L/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/bash-4.2/../readline-6.2 needs -traditional... no checking for tgetent... no checking for tgetent in -ltermcap... yes checking which library has the termcap functions... using libtermcap </armv7l>
So how about x86_64? That's the one we should really compare to as it's what works atm :)
I've just checked this (for x86_64). For openSUSE:Factory it fails, with the same error. https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=bash&project=openSUSE%3AFactory While for Base:System it's fine. https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=bash&project=Base%3ASystem
So it looks like it has been fixed. But it needs to be submitted / approved in openSUSE:Factory.
I found out that the cause is the ncurses package. The latest version hasn't been committed to openSUSE:Factory. I've just sent submit request: 94346
Cool, thanks! Alex -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
participants (2)
-
Alexander Graf -
Joop Boonen