14 Dec
2011
14 Dec
'11
1:34 p.m.
Hi,
after we have bootstrapped java-1_6_0-openjdk, now most of the stuff is
blocked by "ant-junit" (subpackage of ant-antlr). That one fails to build due
to running OOM during building javadocs.
I've quickly checked, and it seems building javadocs is not really necessary,
as the tarball has already javadocs included. So we could skip that step,
which already helps. It seems the spec file had a %build_javadocs define that
is not really functional anymore (ant distribution includes ant javadocs,
which is run unconditional, so the spec file actually builds javadocs twice I
think).
The alternative solution, which seems to work as well and reduces build
differences is this small patch:
--- build.xml
+++ build.xml
@@ -1358,7 +1358,7 @@
<target name="-javadocs.do" if="jdk1.5+"
unless="javadoc.notrequired">
<mkdir dir="${build.javadocs}"/>
<javadoc useexternalfile="yes"
- maxmemory="1000M"
+ maxmemory="512M"
destdir="${build.javadocs}"
author="true"
version="true"
which finishes building javadocs target successfully after a chewing for 160
minutes under qemu (53 minutes on native hardware).
Currently I went for this solution (patch is only applied on %arm), any
comments, ideas appreciated. I guess it would help overall build speed by only
building "ant jars " and maybe "ant test-jars" and not also javadocs?
Greetings,
Dirk
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner(a)opensuse.org
14 Dec
14 Dec
1:58 p.m.
New subject: [opensuse-arm] Re: Java related package build on ARM
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 01:34:54PM +0100, Dirk Müller wrote:
Hi,
Hallo Dirk,
after we have bootstrapped java-1_6_0-openjdk, now most of the stuff is
blocked by "ant-junit" (subpackage of ant-antlr). That one fails to build due
to running OOM during building javadocs.
I've quickly checked, and it seems building javadocs is not really necessary,
as the tarball has already javadocs included. So we could skip that step,
Really? As tar -tf apache-ant-1.8.2-src.tar.bz2 did not show me anything
like javadoc (excluding ant's task, which is really diferent thing).
which already helps. It seems the spec file had a
%build_javadocs define that
is not really functional anymore (ant distribution includes ant javadocs,
which is run unconditional, so the spec file actually builds javadocs twice I
think).
I see, the %build_javadoc macro is defined, but not used and target
distribution covers jaavdoc build. I will fix that
The alternative solution, which seems to work as well and reduces build
differences is this small patch:
--- build.xml
+++ build.xml
@@ -1358,7 +1358,7 @@
<target name="-javadocs.do" if="jdk1.5+"
unless="javadoc.notrequired">
<mkdir dir="${build.javadocs}"/>
<javadoc useexternalfile="yes"
- maxmemory="1000M"
+ maxmemory="512M"
destdir="${build.javadocs}"
author="true"
version="true"
which finishes building javadocs target successfully after a chewing for 160
minutes under qemu (53 minutes on native hardware).
Currently I went for this solution (patch is only applied on %arm), any
comments, ideas appreciated. I guess it would help overall build speed by only
building "ant jars " and maybe "ant test-jars" and not also javadocs?
I vote for exclude ant-javadoc (.*-javadoc (?) even that is not so easy)
build at all on %arm. Reasons are
* arm is now built in qemu using interpreted java, which is slow^2 than
on other arches
* we already have ant-javadoc built well on i586/x86_64 so this won't
add us anything new
* as there are no dependencies on javadoc packages, there won't be any
problems with excluding
Adrian, what would you say? As far I remember, you are not so happy with
that approach.
Regards
Michal Vyskocil
5 p.m.
New subject: [opensuse-arm] Re: Java related package build on ARM
Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2011, 13:58:43 schrieb Michal Vyskocil:
well, we (esp. Alex) worked on improving it. It is not as horrible as it was.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 01:34:54PM +0100, Dirk Müller
wrote:
...
Hi,
Hallo Dirk, which finishes
building javadocs target successfully after a chewing for
160 minutes under qemu (53 minutes on native hardware).
Currently I went for this solution (patch is only applied on %arm), any
comments, ideas appreciated. I guess it would help overall build speed
by only building "ant jars " and maybe "ant test-jars" and not also
javadocs?
I vote for exclude ant-javadoc (.*-javadoc (?) even that is not so
easy)
build at all on %arm. Reasons are
* arm is now built in qemu using interpreted java, which is slow^2 than
on other arches * we already have ant-javadoc built well on
i586/x86_64 so this won't
add us anything new
* as there are no dependencies on javadoc packages, there won't be any
problems with excluding
Adrian, what would you say? As far I remember, you are not so happy with
that approach.
Hm, I have no opinion. If you don't need to fix/update documentation according
to our distro (or package configuration) it is pointless to re-generate.
--
Adrian Schroeter
SUSE Linux Products GmbH
email: adrian(a)suse.de
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner(a)opensuse.org
15 Dec
15 Dec
9:58 a.m.
New subject: [opensuse-arm] Re: Java related package build on ARM
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 05:00:08PM +0100, Adrian Schröter wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2011, 13:58:43 schrieb
Michal Vyskocil:
well, we (esp. Alex) worked on improving it. It is not as horrible as it was.
OK, then I have submitted a fixed ant package to Factory - request 96712
* changed distribution ant target to dist
* make javadoc target really configurable
* disable it on %{arm}
Regards
Michal Vyskocil
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 01:34:54PM +0100, Dirk
Müller wrote:
...
Hi,
Hallo Dirk, which
finishes building javadocs target successfully after a chewing for
160 minutes under qemu (53 minutes on native hardware).
Currently I went for this solution (patch is only applied on %arm), any
comments, ideas appreciated. I guess it would help overall build speed
by only building "ant jars " and maybe "ant test-jars" and not also
javadocs?
I vote for exclude ant-javadoc (.*-javadoc (?) even that is not so
easy)
build at all on %arm. Reasons are
* arm is now built in qemu using interpreted java, which is slow^2 than
on other arches * we already have ant-javadoc built well on
i586/x86_64 so this won't
add us anything new
* as there are no dependencies on javadoc packages, there won't be any
problems with excluding
Adrian, what would you say? As far I remember, you are not so happy with
that approach.
Hm, I have no opinion. If you don't need to fix/update documentation according
to our distro (or package configuration) it is pointless to re-generate. 
10:09 a.m.
New subject: [opensuse-arm] Re: Java related package build on ARM
On 15.12.2011, at 09:58, Michal Vyskocil <mvyskocil(a)suse.cz> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 05:00:08PM +0100, Adrian
Schröter wrote:
That means that on openSUSE:Factory:ARM we'll be missing the documentation noarch
packages, because it's not built in the same repo as x86, right?
Alex
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner(a)opensuse.org
Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2011, 13:58:43 schrieb
Michal Vyskocil:
well, we (esp. Alex) worked on improving it. It is not as horrible as it was.
OK, then I have submitted a fixed ant package to Factory - request 96712
* changed distribution ant target to dist
* make javadoc target really configurable
* disable it on %{arm} On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 01:34:54PM +0100, Dirk
Müller wrote:
...
Hi,
Hallo Dirk, which
finishes building javadocs target successfully after a chewing for
160 minutes under qemu (53 minutes on native hardware).
Currently I went for this solution (patch is only applied on %arm), any
comments, ideas appreciated. I guess it would help overall build speed
by only building "ant jars " and maybe "ant test-jars" and not also
javadocs?
I vote for exclude ant-javadoc (.*-javadoc (?) even that is not so
easy)
build at all on %arm. Reasons are
* arm is now built in qemu using interpreted java, which is slow^2 than
on other arches * we already have ant-javadoc built well on
i586/x86_64 so this won't
add us anything new
* as there are no dependencies on javadoc packages, there won't be any
problems with excluding
Adrian, what would you say? As far I remember, you are not so happy with
that approach.
Hm, I have no opinion. If you don't need to fix/update documentation according
to our distro (or package configuration) it is pointless to re-generate.
10:24 a.m.
New subject: [opensuse-arm] Re: Java related package build on ARM
Am Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011, 10:09:36 schrieb Alexander Graf:
On 15.12.2011, at 09:58, Michal Vyskocil
<mvyskocil(a)suse.cz> wrote:
Yes. Even when it would build in the same repo, it would not be available on
arm during build time though (except we define export filters).
I hope there are no packages with build require it.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 05:00:08PM +0100, Adrian
Schröter wrote:
That means that on openSUSE:Factory:ARM we'll be missing the documentation
noarch packages, because it's not built in the same repo as x86, right? Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2011, 13:58:43 schrieb
Michal Vyskocil:
OK, then I have submitted a fixed ant package to Factory -
request 96712
* changed distribution ant target to dist
* make javadoc target really configurable
* disable it on %{arm} On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 01:34:54PM +0100, Dirk
Müller wrote:
> Hi,
Hallo Dirk,
...
> which finishes building javadocs target
successfully after a
> chewing for 160 minutes under qemu (53 minutes on native
> hardware).
>
> Currently I went for this solution (patch is only applied on
> %arm), any comments, ideas appreciated. I guess it would help
> overall build speed by only building "ant jars " and maybe "ant
> test-jars" and not also javadocs?
I vote for exclude ant-javadoc (.*-javadoc (?) even that is not so
easy) build at all on %arm. Reasons are
* arm is now built in qemu using interpreted java, which is slow^2
than
on other arches
well, we (esp. Alex) worked on improving it. It is not as horrible as
it was.>>
* we already have ant-javadoc built well on
i586/x86_64 so this
won't
add us anything new
* as there are no dependencies on javadoc packages, there won't be
any
problems with excluding
Adrian, what would you say? As far I remember, you are not so happy
with that approach.
Hm, I have no opinion. If you don't need to fix/update documentation
according to our distro (or package configuration) it is pointless to
re-generate.> Alex
--
Adrian Schroeter
SUSE Linux Products GmbH
email: adrian(a)suse.de
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner(a)opensuse.org
12:12 p.m.
New subject: [opensuse-arm] Re: Java related package build on ARM
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:24:26AM +0100, Adrian Schröter wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011, 10:09:36 schrieb
Alexander Graf:
> On 15.12.2011, at 09:58, Michal Vyskocil <mvyskocil(a)suse.cz> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 05:00:08PM +0100, Adrian Schröter wrote:
> >> Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2011, 13:58:43 schrieb Michal Vyskocil:
> >>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 01:34:54PM +0100, Dirk Müller wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >> > >>>
Hallo Dirk,
> > > >> ...
> > >
>>>> which finishes building javadocs target successfully after a
> >>>> chewing for 160 minutes under qemu (53 minutes on native
> >>>> hardware).
> >>> >
>>>> Currently I went for this solution (patch is only applied on
> >>>> %arm), any comments, ideas appreciated. I guess it would help
> >>>> overall build speed by only building "ant jars " and
maybe "ant
> >>>> test-jars" and not also javadocs?
> >> > >>> I
vote for exclude ant-javadoc (.*-javadoc (?) even that is not so
> >>> easy) build at all on %arm. Reasons are
> >> > >>> *
arm is now built in qemu using interpreted java, which is slow^2
> >>> than
> >> > >>>
on other arches
> > > >> well,
we (esp. Alex) worked on improving it. It is not as horrible as
> >> it was.> > >>> *
we already have ant-javadoc built well on i586/x86_64 so this
> >>> won't
> >> > >>>
add us anything new
> >> > >>> *
as there are no dependencies on javadoc packages, there won't be
> >>> any
> >> > >>>
problems with excluding
> >> > >>>
Adrian, what would you say? As far I remember, you are not so happy
> >>> with that approach.
> > > >> Hm, I
have no opinion. If you don't need to fix/update documentation
> >> according to our distro (or package configuration) it is pointless to
> >> re-generate. > > OK, then
I have submitted a fixed ant package to Factory - request 96712
> > > * changed distribution ant target to
dist
> > * make javadoc target really configurable
> > * disable it on %{arm}
> That means that on openSUSE:Factory:ARM
we'll be missing the documentation
> noarch packages, because it's not built in the same repo as x86, right?
Frankly I see no reason to have javadoc package on arm as this is
mostly not the best machine for development of Java programmes. In fact
I see no reason for -javadoc packages at all, as everyone use google ant
javadoc and read it on the web.
Yes. Even when it would build in the same repo, it would not be available on
arm during build time though (except we define export filters).
I hope there are no packages with build require it.
Quick find . -name '*spec' | xargs grep 'BuildRequires.*ant-javadoc'
returned me nothing, so no build errors on arm are expected.
Regards
Michal Vyskocil
3368
days inactive
3369
days old
6 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Adrian Schröter -
Alexander Graf -
Dirk Müller -
Michal Vyskocil