The competition should be between the current performance king -the AMD
Opteron- and the new Intel Xeon Woodcrest. Preliminary benchmarks show that
the Woodcrest is faster than an Opteron 285, but we should wait until the
new socket F Opteron shows up in a few weeks. The Intel Core 2 Duo is
aimed to compete with the Athlon series.
Regards.-
-----Jean-Lin Pacherie
On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 09:05 +0200, Michal Schulz wrote:
He has asked about Core 2 Duo processors, which will support x86_64 (aka. EM64T) standard. My bad, my apologies. I didn't notice the "2" - didn't even know about it. Looks good, but it doesn't look much different from the Core Duo, EMT64 and the shared L2 cache aside.
Hans
As far as I read on web, the new "Core 2 Duo" introduces tremendous changes related to performance, heating and price. That's the reasons why I'm still waiting for the release. And if the promises and pre-benchmarks were too optimistic, then at least I will benefit from the new prices of the AMD processors :) I must say that I didn't see any comparison of the new Core 2 Duo with the Opteron dual core. Only x2 (including the FX-60) where used in the comparative benchmarks. What I heard about the new AM2 solution from AMD didn't need much attention i far as i understood. Again, I'm not hardware expert and all I know on the subject is from googleling around. So I might be wrong. Regards, Jean-Lin -- Check the List-Unsubscribe header to unsubscribe For additional commands, email: suse-amd64-help@suse.com