Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (856 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse] interesting reading about systemd
  • From: Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 17:28:47 +0300
  • Message-id: <CAA91j0UjrJTPxRniwATL-dMUEz82PAEBaNMVW=Dj6TdikPsW0Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Anton Aylward <opensuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/03/2016 10:19 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Anton Aylward <opensuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On 10/03/2016 09:55 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 2016-10-03 15:22, Anton Aylward wrote:
On 10/03/2016 08:54 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Carlos E. R. <> wrote:


If you don't like that, then remove the relevant entry from /etc/fstab and
create your own unit file specific to that disk.

Absolutely not nice, and an argument against systemd.

Not so!
The generator is a 'backwards compatibility' compromise.

fstab semantic under systemd is *NOT* backward compatible. This is
permanent source of complaints which are ignored.

I did not say it was 'compatable', I said it was a comparability compromise.
Like all compromises it not 'absolutely the same'.


What exactly forced systemd to drop compatible behavior? Why it was
not possible to keep compatible behavior UNLESS extra options enabled
new - presumably, better - one? Until you can explain this, what you
say remains just commonplace without any substance.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >
This Thread
Follow Ups