Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3135 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] Bad RAM support
- From: Per Jessen <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:30:04 +0100
- Message-id: <esu4rs$c0s$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2007/03/10 14:06 (GMT+1400) Horst G. Burkhardt III apparently
> typed:
>
>> If this were 1981 and a 16K chip of static RAM was the best available
>> and cost about $1200 i'd agree. But RAM really is cheap now, so why
>> risk it?
>
> RAM is "really cheap now" only if your system is new or recent.
Even 8-9 year old systems use PC100 and that's still widely available.
I can't remember what memory was called before PC100.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
--
http://www.spamchek.com/ - managed email security.
Starting at SFr1/month/user.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> On 2007/03/10 14:06 (GMT+1400) Horst G. Burkhardt III apparently
> typed:
>
>> If this were 1981 and a 16K chip of static RAM was the best available
>> and cost about $1200 i'd agree. But RAM really is cheap now, so why
>> risk it?
>
> RAM is "really cheap now" only if your system is new or recent.
Even 8-9 year old systems use PC100 and that's still widely available.
I can't remember what memory was called before PC100.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
--
http://www.spamchek.com/ - managed email security.
Starting at SFr1/month/user.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |