Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4610 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse] Re: what chance does the average user have when compiling and installing goes wrong?
  • From: David Bolt <bcrafhfr@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:30:45 +0000
  • Message-id: <UI7XZG9FZBjFFwF3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Dominique Leuenberger
<Dominique.Leuenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:-


>Something about the trust in this page: it seems the src.rpm contains
>an already patched version of par (because of gcc4).

Yes, it does. GCC4 "broke" a few c++ programs because it was rather more
strict in what it accepted.

>Basically, I would
>say, this is bad behaviour of the packager.

That's the first time I've had that said to me. Mind you, TTBOMK, it's
also the first time someone's made any comments on my packaging :)

If someone was really wondering just what I'd changed, they could easily
extract the source rpm and then do a diff against the virgin sources.
However, they don't need to do that. All they need to do now is download
the source rpm, extract it and they can look at the diff.

>But you might still want to have a look into it.

David Bolt

Member of Team Acorn checking nodes at 50 Mnodes/s:
AMD1800 1GB WinXP/SUSE 9.3 | AMD2400 256MB SuSE 9.3 | A3010 4MB RISCOS 3.11
AMD2600(64) 512MB SUSE 10.0 | AMD2400 768MB SUSE 10.0 | A4000 4MB RISCOS 3.11
AMD2800(64) 512MB SUSE 10.1 | RPC600 129MB RISCOS 3.6 | Falcon 14MB TOS 4.02
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >