Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4634 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse] 10.2 system clock too fast and NTP
  • From: John Andersen <jsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:51:19 -0900
  • Message-id: <200612162351.27184.jsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Saturday 16 December 2006 22:09, Darryl Gregorash wrote:
> On 2006-12-17 00:00, ByteEnable wrote:
> > <snip>
> > Yeah, I deleted the /etc/adjtime file, played with hwclock, played with
> > ntp, etc. Its just no workie. <sigh>.
> >
> > Byte
>
> Stop ntpd, delete that file *and* /var/lib/ntp/drift/ntp.drift, then:
>
> grep USER_HZ /usr/src/linux/include/asm/param.h
> adjtimex -p
>
> In the latter, the value of "tick" should be 1 million/USER_HZ. If not,
> then run:
> adjtimex -t <val> -f 0 -o 0
>
> with <val> equal to that value. Now running "adjtimex -p" again should
> show that "tick" has that value, while the values of "offset" and
> "frequency" are zero.
>
> The system clock will now be running in an uncorrected, "raw", state.
> Use "hwclock --hctosys" to bring the system clock into agreement with
> the hardware clock.
>
> Now run "adjtimex -c" to determine any discrepancy between the rates of
> the system and hardware clocks. Comparisons are 10 seconds apart, and
> after the first two, adjtimex will suggest values of "tick" and
> "frequency" that will keep the two clocks at the same rate.
>
> Also use "adjtimex -h <timeserver>" at least twice, over a period of at
> least a couple of hours (the longer the better). Do not reboot the
> system, do not run the ntp daemon, and do not set any time variables in
> either system or hardware clocks, during this time to ensure accurate
> calculations. If /var/log/clocks.log exists, delete it before the first
> run. Starting with the second run, adjtimex will calculate errors in the
> frequency, in ppm, for each of the system and hardware clocks.
>
> It's probably a good idea to let us have a look at the results of all
> this at this point.
>


Darryl:
If anything cried out for a wiki page on opensuse this is it.
Won't you please consider it?




--
_____________________________________
John Andersen
< Previous Next >