Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (2831 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [SLE] Is there any real purpose for hald on a server-only system?
  • From: Per Jessen <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2006 20:38:07 +0200
  • Message-id: <e86fef$kgd$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Bruce Marshall wrote:

> On Saturday 01 July 2006 13:17, Per Jessen wrote:
>> Per Jessen wrote:
>> > Interesting experiment - I'm getting tempted to do one myself.
>>
>> Which I've just done:
>>
>> I did an "insserv -r haldaemon" which complained about 'network"
>> depending on 'haldaemon'. So I did an "insserv -rf haldaemon" instead
>> and rebooted the box.
>> Not having hald running doesn't seem to make much of difference.
>
> This is a Good Thing (tm) right?

I think so, but this server doesn't do much of anything - it's just a
testbox for now - so I'll have to wait and see.
I'm wondering why the 'network' init-script would have a haldaemon
dependency? USB-stuff? PCMCIA?



/Per Jessen, Z├╝rich


--
Check the headers for your unsubscription address
For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@xxxxxxxx
Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@xxxxxxxx


< Previous Next >
Follow Ups