Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3337 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [SLE] Which Linux?
  • From: Randall R Schulz <rschulz@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 08:44:33 -0700
  • Message-id: <200604030844.33811.rschulz@xxxxxxxxx>
Ken,

On Monday 03 April 2006 08:35, ken wrote:
> Randall R Schulz wrote:
> > Ken,
> >
> > On Monday 03 April 2006 08:05, ken wrote:
> >>Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> >>...
> >>
> >>But you did specifically request a reply to your address! Your
> >>address was in the Reply-to field, after all. If you want people
> >> to reply to some other address, why don't you simply put that
> >> address in your Reply-to field? Isn't that what it's there for?
> >> That's what I've always used it for.
> >
> > Your mailer is hallucinating. There was no Reply-To field in
> > Patrick's message.
> >
> >>...
> >
> > Randall Schulz
>
> No, my mailer isn't hallucinating. Because I wanted replies to my
> post to go to the list, I put the list address in the Reply-to field.
> (Makes sense, yes?) The list server must have removed it.

You claimed that Patrick's mail had a Reply-To, which it does not. I
obviously haven't checked them all, but I'm pretty sure none of
Patrick's list postings have a Reply-To header.

Randall Schulz

< Previous Next >
Follow Ups
References