Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3337 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [SLE] Which Linux?
  • From: ken <gebser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 13:40:39 -0400
  • Message-id: <44315E17.80805@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Randall R Schulz wrote:
> Ken,
>
> On Monday 03 April 2006 08:35, ken wrote:
>>Randall R Schulz wrote:
>>>Ken,
>>>
>>>On Monday 03 April 2006 08:05, ken wrote:
>>>>Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>>>>...
>>>>
>>>>But you did specifically request a reply to your address! Your
>>>>address was in the Reply-to field, after all. If you want people
>>>>to reply to some other address, why don't you simply put that
>>>>address in your Reply-to field? Isn't that what it's there for?
>>>>That's what I've always used it for.
>>>Your mailer is hallucinating. There was no Reply-To field in
>>>Patrick's message.
>>>
>>>>...
>>>Randall Schulz
>>No, my mailer isn't hallucinating. Because I wanted replies to my
>>post to go to the list, I put the list address in the Reply-to field.
>> (Makes sense, yes?) The list server must have removed it.
>
> You claimed that Patrick's mail had a Reply-To, which it does not. I
> obviously haven't checked them all, but I'm pretty sure none of
> Patrick's list postings have a Reply-To header.
>
> Randall Schulz
>

Thanks, Randall. I was wondering why I started the thread "Why no
Reply-to?" Does this (my) email have a Reply-to field in it?

--
"This world ain't big enough for the both of us,"
said the big noema to the little noema.


< Previous Next >
Follow Ups