Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (2700 mails)

< Previous Next >
RE: FW: [SLE] rejected email to list
  • From: "Greg Wallace" <jgregw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 19:40:32 -0800
  • Message-id: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAFi/9+yIBsUe66x5a7uVsecKAAAAQAAAAZXIgPBcghEKHY17PDQqPFAEAAAAA@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Thursday, June 30, 2005 @ 9:01 AM, Art Fore wrote:

>Art Fore wrote:
>>
>>
>> Greg Wallace wrote:
>>
>>> On Thursday, June 30, 2005 @ 4:26 AM, I wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, June 29, 2005 @ 7:23 AM, Art Fore wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> <suse-linux-e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>> ezmlm-reject: fatal: message already has a Mailing-List header
>>>>> (maybe I should be a sublist) (#5.7.2)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> --- Below this line is a copy of the message.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Return-Path: <art.fore@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Received: (qmail 26996 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2005 15:18:38
>>>>> -0000
>>>>> Received: from unknown (HELO Relay2.suse.de) (195.135.221.8)
>>>>> by 0 with SMTP; 29 Jun 2005 15:18:38 -0000
>>>>> Received: from Relay2.suse.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>>>>> by Relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B43451E
>>>>> for <suse-linux-e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:18:38 +0200
>>>>> (CEST)
>>>>> Received: from Relay2.suse.de ([127.0.0.1])
>>>>> by Relay2.suse.de (Relay2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026)
>>>>> with ESMTP
>>>>> id 06960-09 for <suse-linux-e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
>>>>> Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:18:37 +0200 (CEST)
>>>>> Received: from mx2.suse.de (ns2.suse.de [195.135.220.15])
>>>>> (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
>>>>> (No client certificate requested)
>>>>> by Relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150234509
>>>>> for <suse-linux-e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:18:36 +0200
>>>>> (CEST)
>>>>> Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net (sccrmhc14.comcast.net
>>>>> [204.127.202.59])
>>>>> by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B6951D29B
>>>>> for <suse-linux-e@xxxxxxxx>; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:18:36 +0200
(CEST)
>>>>> Received: from [192.168.121.33]
>>>>> (adsl-71-129-145-33.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net[71.129.145.33])
>>>>> by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with ESMTP
>>>>> id <20050629151826014003p666e>; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 15:18:32
>>>>> +0000
>>>>> Message-ID: <42C2BBBB.5080804@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 08:18:19 -0700
>>>>> From: Art Fore <art.fore@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
>>>>> X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
>>>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>>>> To: suse-linux-e@xxxxxxxx
>>>>> Subject: SPAM: Evolution-Thunderbird
>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>>>>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>>>> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at Relay2.suse.de
>>>>> X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.4 tagged_above=-20.0 required=5.0
>>>>> tests=BAYES_80,
>>>>> DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS
>>>>> X-Spam-Level: *****
>>>>> X-Spam-Flag: YES
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> This line seems to stick out --
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Received: from [192.168.121.33]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Why is there no name attached to 192.168.121.33? To a spam filter, it
>>>> would
>>>> seem it would look like it was coming from an address with no real
>>>> sender
>>>> (maybe like it's being generated from some sort of spam engine).
>>>> Sort of
>>>> like you getting a note from me and the "From" being blank.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Greg Wallace
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have previously relayed messages through my email account from inside
>>> another network and gotten messages back saying I wasn't a registered
>>> user.
>>> Maybe if the address had been missing my name I would have gotten a spam
>>> message instead. Are the messages you have been sending that have been
>>> getting trough being relayed, or are you sending those directly from
your
>>> suse-linux-e registered email address?
>>>
>>> Greg W.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I am sending from thunderbird on Windows (unfortunately since I am at
>> work) on our internal network. the 192.168.121.33 is my ip address on
>> the network which is behind a firewall (Sonic I think). Our internet
>> connection is through a PacBell DSL connection. My email accound is on
>> Comcast.net. I don't understand why my machine ip address is shown,
>> seems like that should be from the NAT on the routers.firewall.
>>
>> Also. some email does get through such as the original from this thread
>> and some of my replys. Would like to see the headers to those emails
>> that do get by, but can't do that.
>>
>> Art
>>


>Tried sending the email via the www.comcast.net browser emal program.
>Still got rejected. Here is the header:

>Hi. This is the qmail-send program at lists.suse.com.
>I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following
addresses.
>This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

><suse-linux-e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>ezmlm-reject: fatal: message already has a Mailing-List header (maybe I
should be a sublist) (#5.7.2)

>--- Below this line is a copy of the message.

>Return-Path: <art.fore@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Received: (qmail 24879 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2005 16:53:56 -0000
>Received: from unknown (HELO Relay2.suse.de) (195.135.221.8)
> by 0 with SMTP; 30 Jun 2005 16:53:56 -0000
>Received: from Relay2.suse.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> by Relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E800A58B4
> for <suse-linux-e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 18:53:55 +0200
(CEST)
>Received: from Relay2.suse.de ([127.0.0.1])
> by Relay2.suse.de (Relay2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with
ESMTP
> id 08152-03 for <suse-linux-e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> Thu, 30 Jun 2005 18:53:54 +0200 (CEST)
>Received: from mx1.suse.de (mail.suse.de [195.135.220.2])
> (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
> (No client certificate requested)
> by Relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E069F7B
> for <suse-linux-e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 18:53:54 +0200
(CEST)
>Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net
[216.148.227.85])
> by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393C4E7CC
> for <suse-linux-e@xxxxxxxx>; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 18:53:54 +0200 (CEST)
>Received: from 204.127.197.119 (rwcrwbc80.asp.att.net[204.127.197.180])
> by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with SMTP
> id <2005063016535201400876ije>; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 16:53:52 +0000
>Received: from [71.129.145.33] by 204.127.197.119;
> Thu, 30 Jun 2005 16:53:52 +0000
>From: art.fore@xxxxxxxxxxx
>To: suse-linux-e@xxxxxxxx
>Subject: SPAM: Evolution-Thunderbird
>Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 16:53:52 +0000
>Message-Id:
><063020051653.22734.42C423A00006368B000058CE22007601800A9D0100D29B9D0E@comc
ast.net>
>X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Dec 17 2004)
>X-Authenticated-Sender: YXJ0LmZvcmVAY29tY2FzdC5uZXQ=
>X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at Relay2.suse.de
>X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=7.2 tagged_above=-20.0 required=5.0
tests=BAYES_95,
> DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS, NO_REAL_NAME, RCVD_BY_IP,
> RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO
>X-Spam-Level: *******
>X-Spam-Flag: YES

>Am trying this with the Comcast webmail to see if it gets through.

>Can anyone tell me if it is possible to export email and addresses from
>Evolution to Thunderbird and import to Thunderbird from Evolution? My
>wife is constantly having problems with Evolution locking up, not
>sending mail, not receiving mail and I would like to try Thunderbird
>with her on Suse 9.2.

>Art

Art:

I have 2 Wan connections, DSL and Cable Modem. I am only registered on
suse-linux-e through the DSL. My From address in my mail client is set to
my DSL address (jgregw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx). If I switch to Cable Modem and post
to the list from there, I get what you're showing here. In that case, the
email is originating from the cable modem network but using the DSL SMTP
(and DSL account email address). For some reason, suse-linux-e doesn't like
mail that is sent through an SMTP that is on a different network from where
the originating mail comes from.

Greg Wallace




< Previous Next >
List Navigation
Follow Ups