Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4343 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [SLE] A small request.
  • From: SuSEnixER <WideGlide@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 20:51:52 -0500
  • Message-id: <20021103015152.GM3560@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
* jaakko tamminen <jaakko.tamminen@xxxxxxxxxx> [11-02-02 20:31]:
> * Philipp Thomas <pth@xxxxxxxxx> [3 Nov 2002 01:14:02 -0000]:
> > A normal conversation is always statement and reply, or do you answer
> > before you're questioned? Why change the way a conversation normally
> > goes only because it's a written one?
>
> Yet another, who think that he is the only one being correct...
>
> Do You want to follow a conversation so, that before every new sentence You
> want to listen the conversation from the beginning?

So YOU read the answer and then automatically discern the question and
conversation that led to the answer.

In your world, there should never be a debate. You should offer your
services to the police departments of the world. You would be able to
solve cases before they existed.

In a close group existing of a very few individuals all readily
acquainted with the subject matter, TOFU in precise, limited statements
would perhaps (perhaps) be desirable (perhaps). But, if you entered a
discorse that had already progressed some distance from the start, it
would be very nearly impossible to intelligently advance or comprehend
the previous situations. And the next person to try to understand the
conversation would be imposed.

Would you write the final chapter to a book for publish before the
beginning.

Logic, not personal preference (or disregard) should rule.
--
Patrick Shanahan
Registered Linux User #207535
@ http://counter.li.org

< Previous Next >