Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-buildservice (251 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-buildservice] Re: [PATCH] [api] Don't fail on diffing request which submit new packages
  • From: Marcus Hüwe <suse-tux@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 10:20:28 +0200
  • Message-id: <20100907082028.GB4274@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 2010-09-07 10:10:16 +0200, Adrian Schröter wrote:
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 10:02:44 Marcus Hüwe wrote:
On 2010-09-06 20:24:01 +0200, OBS build-service wrote:
- # for requests accepted with OBS 2.0 and before, this can not
work in all cases
- path =
"/source/%s/%s?oproject=%s&opackage=%s&cmd=diff&expand=1" %
- [CGI.escape(action.source.project),
CGI.escape(action.source.package), CGI.escape(,
- if['rev']
- path += "&rev=#{action.source.rev}"
+ # for requests not yet accepted or accepted with OBS 2.0 and
+ if DbPackage.find_by_project_and_name(, )
+ path =
"/source/%s/%s?oproject=%s&opackage=%s&cmd=diff&expand=1" %
+ [CGI.escape(action.source.project),
CGI.escape(action.source.package), CGI.escape(,
+ if['rev']
+ path += "&rev=#{action.source.rev}"
+ end
+ else
+ diff_text = "New package: " + + "/" + + "\n" + diff_text
Hmm there's no need for this check. If we pass the "missingok=1"
query parameter to the backend we should be able to diff against
a "missing"/non-existent package.

hm, good point, but that would lead to a full diff of the new packages, right


In this way the new packages would mentioned on top of the diff to make it
It is not important for the webui though, because it has an extra handling.

Hmm what about if we do it this way: if "command_diff" is called with
a "unified=1" query parameter it sends back a unified diff (even for
new packages). Without this parameter the current format is used.

Is osc showing new packages also explicit somehow ?

No it simply prints a unified diff.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >