June 2009 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 506831] New: /etc/init.d/sshd: incorrect usage of daemonstartproc ?
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 26 Dec '19

26 Dec '19

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506831 Summary: /etc/init.d/sshd: incorrect usage of daemonstartproc ? Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: Milestone 1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: P5 - None Component: Other AssignedTo: anicka(a)novell.com ReportedBy: puzel(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: Development # /etc/init.d/sshd restart Shutting down SSH daemon Starting SSH daemonstartproc: option -p does not work in force mode sshd daemon seems to work OK, though. reproducible: always -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 500134] New: on checksumm errors yast2 software management produces non-informative message
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 14 Feb '19

14 Feb '19

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500134 Summary: on checksumm errors yast2 software management produces non-informative message Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.1 Version: Final Platform: i686 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.1 Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: P5 - None Component: YaST2 AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: grey-olli(a)ya.ru QAContact: jsrain(a)novell.com Found By: --- Created an attachment (id=289482) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=289482) 1st time the problem found User-Agent: Opera/9.64 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.1.1 On start of software management repository refresh is started. If checksumm is wrong for a file related to the repository the resulting message doesn't inform to which repository it relates. So if you've a few repositories installed the message is non-informative. Reproducible: Always Expected Results: Should at least tell to which repository the problem relates. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 509945] New: Enforce packaging of static libraries by rpmlint check
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 09 Dec '17

09 Dec '17

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509945 Summary: Enforce packaging of static libraries by rpmlint check Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: Factory Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: dmueller(a)novell.com ReportedBy: prusnak(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de CC: ro(a)novell.com, mrueckert(a)novell.com, crrodriguez(a)novell.com Found By: Development We are trying to adopt the static libraries packaging scheme described on http://en.opensuse.org/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries By adding rpmlint check we will enforce the correct packaging. rpmlint should check whether the package contains *.{a,la} files and perform these steps: a) package contains *.la files, does not contain *.a files -> throw error suggesting the packager to remove *.la files in %install phase b) package contains only *.la and *.a files -> check if the name ends with "-devel-static", throw error otherwise, suggesting the rename c) package contains *.la, *.a files AND *.so files (and probably some includes) -> check if the name ends with "-devel" AND package also provides "-devel-static" symbol, throw error otherwise, suggesting the addition of symbol -> also point out that packager has to be sure that static libraries are absolutely needed in the system. If not the package should be built with --disable-static and *.la files removed in %install phase -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 502531] New: bsd-games-2.17-81.44: undefined code
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 19 Aug '16

19 Aug '16

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502531 Summary: bsd-games-2.17-81.44: undefined code Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: Factory Platform: All OS/Version: openSUSE 11.1 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: dcb314(a)hotmail.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- I just tried to build Factory package bsd-games-2.17-81.44 and the build said monop/cards.c:138: warning: operation on "dp->last_card" may be undefined The source code is dp->last_card = ++(dp->last_card) % dp->num_cards; I agree with the compiler. Better code would be dp->last_card = (dp->last_card + 1) % dp->num_cards; -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 505546] New: Grub fails to write bootrecord on dmraid disk (GPT labeled)
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 16 Aug '16

16 Aug '16

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505546 User Winfrid.Tschiedel(a)ts.fujitsu.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505546#c500322 Summary: Grub fails to write bootrecord on dmraid disk (GPT labeled) Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: Milestone 1 Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Installation AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: Winfrid.Tschiedel(a)ts.fujitsu.com QAContact: jsrain(a)novell.com Found By: --- Created an attachment (id=293215) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=293215) saved installation logs User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; Tablet PC 1.7; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; MS-RTC LM 8; InfoPath.2) I tried to install openSUSE 11.2 Milestone 1 on Fujitsu Primergy RX220 ( Promise FastTrak TX 150 S4 ), one disk with RAID0, GPT labeled ( Same problem exists also on Fujitsu Primergy rx200s4 with ESB2 (LSI Firmware) and one disk RAID0. Installation works until the boot record should be written. In case of rx220 the boot record should be written to the root partition. Beside the error 22: No such partition also the MBR was destroyed. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Installed openSUSE 11.2 on fake raid with GPT Actual Results: No boot redord was written Expected Results: Correct operation, install a system which can be booted afterwards In the latest release of fedora 11 (Preview) almost everything works out of the box, which means only manual interaction for the following items is needed : mklabel gpt (no botton for writing new partition table!) mkinitrd on distribution is in error for details please read #500322 (bugzilla.redhat.com) I tried to write a new bootrecord with fedora 11 - which worked - but openSUSE 11.2 cannot handle this bootrecord - so chainloading failed . Next I tried to load the openSUSE boot menu with configfile /boot/grub/menu.lst So I could start openSUSE 11.2, but boot fails because root partition is not found. This seems to be similar to #500979 - with one difference that at that time (SLED 11) only the problem on ESB2 occurred. There is also a second difference, in the previous edition (openSUSE 11.1,SLED 11) there was a problem with GPT and dmraid, which ended up, that the RAID information was destroyed (please see #436825 ) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Bug 517947] New: dd_rescue: useless "Invalid argument" warnings
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 15 Apr '16

15 Apr '16

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517947 Summary: dd_rescue: useless "Invalid argument" warnings Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.1 Version: Final Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: jengelh(a)medozas.de QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: Beta-Customer For whatever reason, dd_rescue spews a non-fatal Invalid argument warning every 32M (why 32?). # dd_rescue /dev/zero /dev/null dd_rescue: (warning): /dev/null (32768.0k): Invalid argument! 31744.0k dd_rescue: (warning): /dev/null (65536.0k): Invalid argument! 64512.0k dd_rescue: (warning): /dev/null (98304.0k): Invalid argument! 97280.0k dd_rescue: (warning): /dev/null (131072.0k): Invalid argument! 130048.0k dd_rescue: (warning): /dev/null (163840.0k): Invalid argument! 162816.0k dd_rescue: (warning): /dev/null (196608.0k): Invalid argument! 195584.0k dd_rescue: (warning): /dev/null (229376.0k): Invalid argument! 228352.0k dd_rescue: (warning): /dev/null (262144.0k): Invalid argument! 261120.0k dd_rescue: (warning): /dev/null (294912.0k): Invalid argument! 293888.0k dd_rescue: (warning): /dev/null (327680.0k): Invalid argument! 326656.0k dd_rescue: (warning): /dev/null (360448.0k): Invalid argument! 359424.0k dd_rescue: (warning): /dev/null (393216.0k): Invalid argument! 392192.0k dd_rescue: (warning): /dev/null (425984.0k): Invalid argument! 424960.0k dd_rescue: (warning): /dev/null (458752.0k): Invalid argument! 457728.0k dd_rescue: (warning): /dev/null (491520.0k): Invalid argument! 490496.0k dd_rescue: (warning): /dev/null (524288.0k): Invalid argument! 523264.0k dd_rescue: (info): ipos: 539648.0k, opos: 539648.0k, xferd: 539648.0k errs: 0, errxfer: 0.0k, succxfer: 539648.0k +curr.rate: 1182266kB/s, avg.rate: 1047984kB/s, avg.load: 50.5% -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 517722] New: tog-pegasus-2.9.0-1.7: possible off by one error in for loop
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 15 Apr '16

15 Apr '16

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517722 Summary: tog-pegasus-2.9.0-1.7: possible off by one error in for loop Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: Factory Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: dcb314(a)hotmail.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- I just had a look at factory package tog-pegasus-2.9.0-1.7 For source code file pegasus/src/Pegasus/Common/Logger.cpp, around line 258 is the source code for (unsigned int i=0; i<=timeStamp.size(); i++) { if(timeStamp[i] == '/' || timeStamp[i] == ':') { Clearly broken code. Suggest new code for (unsigned int i = 0; i < timeStamp.size(); i++) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 517281] New: sane-backends-1.0.20: bad for loop
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 15 Apr '16

15 Apr '16

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517281 Summary: sane-backends-1.0.20: bad for loop Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: Factory Platform: All OS/Version: openSUSE 11.1 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: dcb314(a)hotmail.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- I just had a look at factory package sane-backends-1.0.20-2.2 For source code file sane-backends-1.0.20/backend/hp3900_config.c around line 940 is the source code for (a = 0; a < 12; a++) { if (myreg[a].resolution == resolution) but struct myreg only has six entries, not 12. Suggest rework code. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 516688] New: Open Office Quick Starter Cannot Load on X_64 Hardware
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 15 Apr '16

15 Apr '16

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516688 Summary: Open Office Quick Starter Cannot Load on X_64 Hardware Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.1 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.1 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: OpenOffice.org AssignedTo: bnc-team-ooo(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: alpha096(a)virginbroadband.com.au QAContact: kyu(a)novell.com Found By: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042700 SUSE/3.0.10-1.1.1 Firefox/3.0.10 Default Installation of KDE4.1 I went to System>Desktop Applet>Open Office Quickstarter The first before it loads the user gets a large amount of text discussing the benefits and discusses the minus being it takes up a small percentage of RAM. I clicked on O.K and the received an error stating it could not be loaded into resident RAM, however it sits in the system tray, with the resident option disabled. With the resident module disabled, I cannot see any justification for the applet to be present. The Open Office Quickstarter Applet has not functioned since X_64 was released in about version 10.2. I would suggest that it is either fixed or removed from the packing list. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.As Above 2. 3. Actual Results: Error Response - means that the Quick Starter will not load into resident RAM and is therefore useless Expected Results: It gets fixed or removed from X_64 Packing list. This bug was reported by ME back in version 10.2 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 18

[Bug 516511] New: CUPS 1.3.10 DNS rebinding protection causes regression
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 15 Apr '16

15 Apr '16

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516511 User jsmeix(a)novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516511#c3118 Summary: CUPS 1.3.10 DNS rebinding protection causes regression Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: Factory Platform: All OS/Version: SuSE Other Status: ASSIGNED Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Printing AssignedTo: jsmeix(a)novell.com ReportedBy: jsmeix(a)novell.com QAContact: jsmeix(a)novell.com CC: mzugec(a)novell.com Found By: Development CUPS 1.3.10 for which I have a pending submit-request for Factory has in its CHANGES.txt: --------------------------------------------------------------------- - SECURITY: The scheduler now protects against DNS rebinding attacks (STR #3118) --------------------------------------------------------------------- but the CUPS 1.3.10 fix causes the following regression: In CUPS 1.3.9 the command lpoptions -h localhost -p <queue_name> -l works on my openSUSE 11.1 workstation. But in CUPS 1.3.10 the command results a "lpoptions: Unable to get PPD file for lj1220: Bad Request" error message but the command lpoptions -p <queue_name> -l still works. Setting "ServerAlias *" in /etc/cups/cupsd.conf does not help. A consequence of this regression is that it would no longer work in YaST to change printer driver options because YaST runs "lpoptions -h localhost -p <queue_name> -l" to determine the current driver option settings for a queue. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5