On Monday 19 December 2011 12:13:15 Duncan Mac-Vicar P. wrote:
On 12/19/2011 11:27 AM, Klaus Kaempf wrote:
I prefer the solution of vendoring the patch and keep things simple making the patch simply "Not relevant" if any of the affected packages is from a different vendor than the patch. You can't assume the patch will behave correctly (in terms of fixing an issue) if one of the components was replaced.
But that's IMO not 'not relevant'. If the system has an affected package installed, the issue addressed by the patch is relevant. Just the solution the patch offers is not (auto-)applicable. I think we should at least try to update 'our' packages. -- cu, Michael Andres +------------------------------------------------------------------+ Key fingerprint = 2DFA 5D73 18B1 E7EF A862 27AC 3FB8 9E3A 27C6 B0E4 +------------------------------------------------------------------+ Michael Andres SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Development, ma@suse.de GF:Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer, HRB16746(AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstrasse 5, D-90409 Nuernberg, Germany, ++49 (0)911 - 740 53-0 +------------------------------------------------------------------+ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: zypp-devel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: zypp-devel+owner@opensuse.org